The Beauty Underneath: Revitalizing Indigenous Shellfish Harvest in Semiahmoo Bay
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
North American coastal Indigenous communities have feasted from the tidelands since time immemorial. Abundant clams, oysters, mussels, seaweed and other marine resources provided seasonal sustenance, opportunity for communities to gather, to share intergenerational knowledge, ceremony, language and cultural values. Since settler contact, land development, pollution and overharvest have diminished native oyster populations and contaminated clams and other marine resources. Current colonial coastal governance has responded with blanket shellfish harvest closures along much of the British Columbia coastline, walking away from the problem, and focusing attention on areas important for commercial harvest. This participatory action research focuses on the transboundary waters of Boundary Bay (Steloqwen in SENĆOŦEN), home of the Semiahmoo First Nation people. This place-based study reveals pathways towards revitalizing Indigenous shellfish harvest on the Canadian side of Steloqwen, through complex social-ecological system analysis and Indigenous resurgence and storytelling. While there are potential future economic benefits to Semiahmoo First Nation through the re-opening of shellfish harvesting beds, Semiahmoo are primarily interested in revitalizing their traditional practices of being out on the land, digging for clams, having opportunity for elders to share with young people about culture and language and connection to the bay. They want to restore reciprocal relationships that have been lost through contaminated waters and unjust governance. Through a literature review, jurisdictional interviews and Indigenous storytelling workshops, key barriers and opportunities were identified and discussed to reveal a pathway towards revitalizing shellfish harvest in Steloqwen. Firstly, jurisdictional roles and responsibilities related to coastal ecosystem management need to be clarified and re-defined to close existing governance gaps and to be aligned with Indigenous values. Secondly, pollution sources must be identified and controlled, which requires both a consistent, coordinated, and well-communicated monitoring plan as well as a collaborative approach to addressing the variety of potential pollution sources. And thirdly, Semiahmoo First Nation capacity must be bolstered to provide a leadership role in collaborative efforts. All three of these key barriers can be addressed by taking a two-eyed seeing approach, weaving systems analysis and Semiahmoo Indigenous teachings to reveal innovative solutions. In conclusion, this will involve: 1) ȻEN,TOEL, jurisdictional alignment to allow for Indigenous led collaborative watershed remediation, 2) ĆEĆINES, Indigenous led watershed governance with teeth to hold jurisdictions accountable, and 3) XĆETSW̱, Indigenous led collaborative process of looking over, measuring, figuring out and deciding where the pollution sources are and how best to address them. All of these solutions rely on Indigenous capacity to provide leadership and uphold their rights of sovereignty and self-determination. To operationalize this research, Semiahmoo First Nation must be acknowledged and supported as leaders with the capacity and authority to carry out governance in their territory, influencing land and water management on a watershed scale. Short, medium and long-term steps are recommended to achieve the vision of revitalized shellfish harvest and a healthy bay ecosystem.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».