MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7027192912

Chief Justice Winkler to Receive Honourary Doctorate from Osgoode Hall Law School; Plans Underway for New Dispute Resolution Institute and Chair to Honour Legacy of Ontario Chief Justice

2012· article· en· W7027192912 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueDispute Resolution and Class Actions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHonourDispute resolutionEconomic JusticeAlternative dispute resolutionDispute mechanism
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Chief Justice Winkler to Receive Honourary Doctorate from Osgoode Hall Law School; Plans Underway for New Dispute Resolution Institute and Chair to Honour Legacy of Ontario Chief Justice\nTORONTO, June 4, 2012 – Ontario Chief Justice Warren K. Winkler, who has received numerous awards and honours during his distinguished years of service to the legal profession, the judiciary and the community, will be presented with the degree of Doctor of Laws (Honoris Causa) at Osgoode's Spring Convocation on Thursday, June 14, 2012 at 3.30 p.m. in the Convocation Pavilion of the Rexall Centre on York's Keele campus.\nLorne Sossin, Dean of Osgoode Hall Law School at York University, also announced that planning is underway to create the Winkler Institute for Dispute Resolution and the Winkler Chair in Dispute Resolution to be housed at Osgoode. The Chair will lead the Institute, which will be devoted to research and initiatives in support of innovative dispute resolution. The Institute also will house a small and prestigious group of “Winkler Fellows” to give public lectures, collaborate on research projects, and develop pilot projects in fields related to dispute resolution.\nTo be named in honour of Ontario Chief Justice Warren K. Winkler (LLB ’62, LLM ’64), the Winkler initiative at Osgoode will recognize and celebrate his commitment to innovation in dispute resolution as Chief Justice. Winkler has devoted his 50-year career as a labour lawyer and then a jurist to the improvement of both traditional and alternative methods of dispute resolution.\n“Chief Justice Winkler has made tremendous contributions to the development of dispute resolution in Ontario,” Sossin said. “Given Osgoode’s rich tradition of leadership in the field, it is fitting that a leading global institute on dispute resolution should be launched here, and we are honoured that the Chief Justice has agreed to be its namesake.”\nSossin said that a volunteer committee, comprised of admirers of the Chief Justice’s work and chaired by Neil Finkelstein of McCarthy Tétrault, has begun fundraising for the Winkler Chair and Winkler Institute for Dispute Resolution, which should allow the initiative to be launched to coincide with the start of Winkler’s retirement.\nSossin referred to Winkler as “a nationally recognized legal scholar and author, an expert in labour law and class action law as well as a distinguished jurist who is renowned for his judicial mediation skills and alternative dispute methods.”\nHe noted that Winkler has judicially mediated many large national and international disputes including the Air Canada Restructuring, and the Walkerton Tainted Water Class Action, and was instrumental in the settlement of some of the seemingly most intractable major lawsuits in Canada.\n“In his speeches and writings, Chief Justice Winkler has emphasized the potential of a progressive dispute resolution system to attract economic development and investment and enhance access to justice,” Sossin said.\nWinkler, who is also marking the 50th anniversary of his graduation from Osgoode, was called to the Bar of Ontario in 1965 and was created a Queen’s Counsel in 1977. He was a partner in the law firm of Winkler, Filion & Wakely and practised labour law on behalf of management. He was appointed to the Ontario Court of Justice (General Division) in 1993 then was appointed Regional Senior Judge for Toronto Region in March 2004, and Chief Justice of Ontario in June 2007.\nYork University is a leading interdisciplinary research and teaching university in Canada. York offers a modern, academic experience at the undergraduate and graduate level in Toronto – Canada’s most international city. The third largest university in the country, York is host to a dynamic academic community of 55,000 students and 7,000 faculty and staff, as well as 250,000 alumni worldwide. York’s 10 faculties and 28 research centres conduct ambitious, groundbreaking research that is interdisciplinary, cutting across traditional academic boundaries. This distinctive and collaborative approach is preparing students for the future and bringing fresh insights and solutions to real-world challenges. York University is an autonomous, not-for-profit corporation.\n-30-\nMedia Contact: Virginia Corner, Communications Manager, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, 416-736-5820, vcorner@osgoode.yorku.ca

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,425
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,849

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,002
Communication savante0,0060,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4250,158

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeYLS (Yale Law School)→Même sujetDispute Resolution and Class Actions→Travaux en français237 207→