Comparison of the yellow perch, Perca flavescens Mitchell, populations in Henderson Lake and Savanne Lake, Ontario / Beverlee J. Ritchie. --
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in Henderson Lake exhibit \nstunted growth and poor condition at all ages. In addition, they have \nlower fecundity, longer life span, slower maturation rate, and greater \nsurvival compared to perch in Savanne Lake. \nGillnet catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) indicated that abundance of \nrecruited perch was comparable between lakes, but that fish are at least \n5 years of age before they are recruited to this gear in Henderson Lake. \nGillnet CPUE identified diurnal activity periods for perch and walleye \n(Stizostedion vitreum vitreum) in both lakes, but the evening \noffshore movements and morning onshore movements by perch in Henderson Lake were more pronounced and prolonged. Sampling in littoral areas with bag seines prove that perch and walleye closely associate at dawn and dusk in Savanne Lake, but do not associate at any time in Henderson Lake. Young perch are the dominant littoral species in Savanne Lake, but share dominance with unutilized mimic shiners (Notropis volucellus) and blacknose shiners (Notropis heterolepis) in Henderson Lake. \nNo relationship between spring water temperature or precipitation \nand year-class strength of Savanne young-of-the-year (YOY) walleye and \nperch year-classes could be demonstrated. Strong YOY walleye \nyear-classes did not occur in the same years as strong YOY perch \nyear-classes in Savanne Lake. However, weaker YOY walleye year-classes \nwere produced in those years when YOY perch grew faster. \nSeasonal and annual changes in forage abundance determined the \nfrequency of prey items found in Savanne and Henderson perch stomachs. \nIntraspecific diet overlap and cannibalism was greater in Henderson perch than in Savanne perch. The incidence of cannibalism was a function \nof the availability of alternate prey in both lakes. Predation by \nwalleye, northern pike (Esox lucius). and perch on same prey \n(ninespine sticklebacks Pungitius pungitius, perch, and mayfly \nnymphs) is frequent in Henderson Lake, but interspecific segregation of \nprey utilization occurs in Savanne Lake. \nValues for mean age to maturity of male and female perch as \ndetermined by the proposed Probit Method were more comparable to \nempirical values than those determined by the Abrosov, Modified Abrosov, \nand Lysack methods. \nApparent differences between the two populations in behavior and \nbiological characteristics are attributed to; lower predation levels on \nHenderson perch; differences in the physical structure of the two lakes. \nMutual predation on the forage base in Henderson Lake at both an \nintraspecific and interspecific level helps to amplify these \ndifferences. The effect of physical characteristics, especially water \ntransparency and macrophyte growth on predator-prey interactions is also \nexamined.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».