Conflicted Consorts: Prince Albert and Prince Philip's Crisis of Masculinity as Presented in Victoria and The Crown
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis explores how ITV’s Victoria (2016 - ) and Netflix’s The Crown (2016 - ) present Prince Albert and Prince Philip as feeling conflicted in their position of royal consort, a role more commonly occupied by a woman, due to their preconceived ideas of masculinity. It looks into the historical background of Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (1840 – 1861) and Prince Philip of Greece and Denmark (1921 - ). Albert and Philip both married into the British royal family and became the consorts of Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth II, respectively. The essay also discusses biopics, their credibility, and how the biopic series Victoria and The Crown showcase the public and private lives of these royals in a credible way and portray the princes’ masculinity crises in their roles as consorts. \nMasculinity is learned by children through their society’s rules of behavior, and Prince Albert and Prince Philip grew up in a hegemonic masculine society that taught them that the husband should be the provider of the family. Victoria shows how this drives Albert to struggle with his image as a man since his wife is richer and more powerful than he, and has to solve problems on behalf of both of them. Albert slowly grows to resent his position and becomes cold and distant towards his wife and children. The Crown shows how Philip struggles with becoming the less powerful party in his marriage when Elizabeth becomes queen and he loses his naval career and his preferred home, while also learning that his children will not carry his name. He gradually becomes bitter and spiteful towards his wife and oldest son. Both princes show signs of having disassociated themselves from behavior stereotypically considered feminine, such as being scared and admitting to shortcomings, and instead they act aggressively towards their spouse and family.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».