Community dental service--the first year.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In July 2000, the first group of graduates entered compulsory community dental service. The aim of this study was to document the experiences of the community dentists in their first year of placement. A cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out among 171 community dentists. A structured questionnaire divided into nine sections: demography, the allocation process, accommodation and living conditions, dental clinic facilities--equipment and materials, work environment, income, sense of achievement, intellectual fulfillment. Thirty five per cent of the sample responded. Of the respondents 54% could speak the local language; almost half (45%) felt that the allocation process was not handled efficiently and 40% said that they needed more information; 60% were placed within 20 km of the nearest town; 26% did not have access to telephone or fax and only 52% were provided with accommodation. Twenty six per cent described the condition of the clinics as poor. Almost a quarter of the respondents indicated that they did not have full sets of instruments. Ten per cent did not have an autoclave nor a high-speed handpiece. Fifty seven per cent did not have oxygen and half the clinics did not have any emergency equipment. Fifty per cent reported that equipment broke down often and an equal number that it was not fixed promptly. More than 90% indicated that they needed a short course to help with repairs. Almost two-thirds said that they enjoyed their work environment. Fifty three per cent had supervision, but 30% felt that they did not need supervision. Although 75% felt that their professional competence had been enhanced, more than three-quarters indicated that they had lost some of their clinical competence in one or other area. While 58% felt that there were many opportunities to improve clinical skills, almost two thirds felt that they were over-skilled for the job. Three-quarters of the respondents indicated that the year had been fulfilling and worthwhile. Problem areas centred around the adequacy of the information provided, accommodation and breakdown of equipment. With the next community service placement, it would be useful if the experiences and lessons of the first year could be taken into account.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».