Discussion Following the Remarks of Mr. Power and Mr. Cole
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
David Cole, you did you not disappoint.We have ten minutes for questions.I am sure they are going to be plenty after those two thought-provoking presentations.MS. JANSSEN: I guess the good news is that in Canada, we do not discriminate against foreign nationals, yet, probably because the Immigration Act has a provision saying specifically that the Charter applies, and the Charter is not distinct in all clauses between nationals and non-nationals.But, having said that, there is a real issue, and the PR card is interesting for the information of the audience.The PR or permanent residence card, has been in the works for years and years and did not come out because they could not find a way to make it secure enough.After September 1 1 th , it was finally announced.As of June of last year, every new foreign national that becomes a permanent resident in Canada must have a PR card.Anyone who is a permanent resident and not a citizen, who does not have a PR card at the end of this year, will not be allowed back in the country until he can get one.It will be very tough to get one outside of the country.It is a way for us to eliminate people who are not there all the time.On the privacy issue, in Canada when you phone in you can do so as an immigrant or wanting to be an immigrant.As long as you have your name, address, postal code, phone number, and file number you can actually see not only where you are in immigration and what you have written and whose written for you, but you can also see every time you have had a traffic ticket or been stopped for a speeding ticket.Our police reports are already integrated with our immigration information.Beyond that our immigration information is integrated with our citizenship application information, which is integrated with health information.Legal or not, you can already get our computer systems under FAUS and under CAPES is the International system.Since you can already get all that all information, what are the legalities of this mixed information?MR.POWER: My short answer is that every rule has an exception.When people think about the Privacy Act in the Canadian context, you think this is going to keep my personal information private.When you look at section 82 of the Privacy Act, you look at exceptions associated with it.If there is lawful authority under another act, it can be disclosed.You can therefore have a legal basis under the authority that I suspect, certainly, under the Departmental legislation, perhaps under IRPA, you probably have authority in there for the linking of all this information.If you have that authority, then there is nothing under the Privacy Act that would prevent you
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,030 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,015 | 0,026 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,102 | 0,069 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».