FACTORS OF A PHYSICIAN QUALITY IMPROVEMENT LEADERSHIP COALITION THAT INFLUENCE PHYSICIAN BEHAVIOUR
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This manuscript-style thesis investigated the Strategic Clinical Improvement Committee (SCIC), a physician-led coalition that developed a provincial laboratory-test ordering overuse (LTOO) initiative aimed at reducing blood urea nitrogen (BUN) test ordering across hospital medicine (MED) units and emergency departments (ED) in Alberta, Canada. Two studies in three separate manuscripts contributed to the mixed methods aim of identifying coalition factors that enable MED and ED physicians to lead, participate in, and influence appropriate BUN test ordering. Manuscript 1 is a scoping review; it resulted in a synthesis of 11 articles representing nine distinct physician-led approaches that incorporate learning the science of improvement. From these, 20 enabler strategies were described, which were grouped to generate eight overarching themes that may enable physician quality improvement (QI) capability, participation, and leadership. Manuscript 2 is a qualitative exploration of the physician experience; interviews with 12 physicians from seven participating hospitals generated textual data. A content analysis was completed that identified nine overarching themes and 11 change techniques that may encourage physician QI involvement and appropriate laboratory test ordering. Manuscript 3 is a combination of the quantitative (total monthly BUN test data for six participating hospitals) and qualitative findings. BUN testing was reduced significantly in five of six hospitals and resulted in cost avoidance. Physicians had similar perceptions of the characteristics that enabled their QI involvement, which included a simple initiative linked to a coalition physician leader and/or member, credibility, mentorship, support personnel, QI education and hands-on training, minimal physician effort, and no clinical workflow disruption. Implementing person- and system-focused intervention components, and communication from a trusted local physician were factors influencing appropriate BUN test ordering. The SCIC was found to be an effective physician QI engagement strategy. Results from these studies deepen understanding of the behavioural characteristics and strategies that motivate physician behaviour for QI involvement and appropriate BUN test ordering, reducing LTOO. Researchers, policymakers, physicians, and health organization leaders may use these findings to establish, deliver, and promote physician-led QI beyond a single context.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle