Impact of soil-structure interaction effects on seismic assessment in moderate seismic zones
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<div data-language="eng" data-ev-field="abstract">Building structures designed in accordance with older versions of building codes and standards are likely to exhibit unsatisfactory behaviour under seismic loads. Existing structures represent an important part of the built heritage and therefore an economic challenge for current governments, as well as a public security issue for users of these buildings. The assessment of seismic response is most often done assuming fixed-base support conditions, thus ignoring the combined response of structure-foundation-soil system. This approach is considered conservative, but it neglects the great potential to reduce seismic demand imposed on the superstructure through controlled foundation yielding, appropriate mobilisation of bearing capacity or the uplifting at the foundation-soil interface. In order to properly assess the seismic behaviour of existing building structures and to make cost-effective decisions regarding their seismic retrofit, it is necessary to put forward reliable evaluation methods that can preferably account for the integrated seismic response of all system elements: the superstructure, the foundation and the underlying soil. In this study, a three-storey reinforced concrete frame building was designed in accordance with the 1965 National Building Code of Canada and its seismic response was assessed using results of nonlinear time history analysis. The Attention was directed at the impact of soil-structure interaction on the seismic assessment. The selected building geometry represents typical 1970's school buildings in Quebec, Canada. Consistent with design practices of that era, the foundations were designed for gravity loads only and for two different soil conditions: rock (site class B) and stiff soil (site class D). Initial assessment was carried out using an equivalent static force method and response spectrum analysis considering typical fixed-base conditions. Subsequent more refined assessments were done with 2D nonlinear time history analyses of the superstructure with the soil-structure interface, and were conducted in OpenSees for a set of simulated ground motions compatible with the design spectrum. Soil-structure interaction effects were modelled using the beam-on-nonlinear-Winkler-foundation concept. Base shears, roof displacements and displacement profiles are determined and compared to those obtained assuming a fixed-base condition. The foundation displacements and stresses in the soil are examined to assess the consequences on the global structural behaviour. The response of the superstructure is evaluated by tracking the elastic demand in beams and columns.<br/></div> © 2024, International Association for Earthquake Engineering. All rights reserved.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».