MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7029202769

INTEGRATING INDIGENOUS FIRE AND SOIL ELEMENTS WITH FOOD AND NUTRITION EDUCATION IN YOUTUBE VIDEO RESOURCES FOR RURAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN CENTRAL SASKATCHEWAN

2025· article· en· W7029202769 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesMitacs
Mots-clésIndigenousGeneral partnershipFood securityOutreachTraditional knowledgeNutrition EducationPopulationCommunity education
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This pilot project was a proof-of-concept endeavour to evaluate how the blending of Indigenous Knowledge and scientific concepts could be applied to Indigenous community needs and high school classrooms in central Saskatchewan. Completed in partnership with rural and Indigenous communities, organizations, and education boards in central Saskatchewan, the project aimed to evaluate current needs for nutritional education in their communities. These needs were evaluated by pursuing these research objectives: 1) to engage with education and Indigenous community stakeholders to co-develop YouTube video resources based on the Elemental Teachings of fire and soil to be incorporated into the high school curriculum; and 2) to gather insights from education and Indigenous community stakeholders on potential enhancement of the videos to further their applicability to educate rural high school students about community food security concepts, Indigenous land-based teachings, and practical nutrition information. The video products were co-created and developed in partnership with the community schools and Indigenous community members. This development included exploring Indigenous partner community needs for improving the content, delivery, and accessibility of these videos to address the food security and nutrition practices for rural and Indigenous high school students. First, the research team from the University of Saskatchewan’s College of Pharmacy and Nutrition and College of Agriculture and Bioresources engaged three rural communities in central Saskatchewan with a high population of Indigenous individuals and youth. Multiple initial community outreach engagements were conducted to evaluate the classrooms, gain perspective on the community needs, and to build relationships with Indigenous partners. Two video products were created that were approximately 15 minutes in length each. After community deliberation, they were based on Indigenous Elemental Teachings regarding fire and soil. The videos covered topics such as community food security, access to traditional foods, and nutrition education needs. They also included three recipe demonstrations to guide students to make simple dishes at home using traditional Indigenous ingredients. Finally, the videos demonstrate the cultural significance of fire and soil, the scientific concepts behind them, and their effect on the nutrition of individuals and communities. A panel of participants consisting of teachers, Indigenous community members, and Elders were then interviewed to review and guide the educational video content. The interviews were then transcribed and analyzed with a qualitative thematic data analysis to identify central themes in the data. Once initial themes were discovered, they were then brought to education professionals and Indigenous community and Elder partners for feedback and to verify accuracy. Data was identified and organized into two main themes: 1) Community Needs and Future Teaching points and 2) Video Feedback. Feedback included that the video products demonstrated the strong cultural significance of fire and soil and included relevant nutrition education for students based on present community food security needs. They also indicated that youth engagement and leadership is necessary to further strengthen nutrition education and food security needs in Indigenous and Saskatchewan classroom settings.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,636
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,206
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Même sujetIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsTravaux en français237 207