Integrating Indigenous perspectives for a just energy transition of Saskatchewan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Canada pledged to achieve net zero by 2050 and important efforts revolving around the energy transition of electricity generation systems toward renewables sources are being carried. Currently, most renewable systems developed are occurring on Indigenous communities’ lands for various reasons. Climatic conditions are suitable for solar and wind-based solutions, space is available, and this trend constitutes an opportunity for the economic development and diversification of Indigenous communities.However, several scholars argue that renewable electricity production projects do not integrate sufficiently Indigenous perspectives as Indigenous communities are still more considered stakeholders that must be consulted rather than partners involved in decision making. According to energy justice scholars, this results in the occultation of several environmental and cultural impacts while the integration of Indigenous views could lead to higher sustainability thanks to higher considerations for nature and benefits for the community. These researchers question the sustainability of an energy transition maintaining Indigenous communities in a situation of dependency and increasing inequalities, instead of becoming participants to their own electric systems, as a crucial step towards the respect of their right to self-determination.This thesis explores the impacts of provincial policies on shaping the conditions of the dialogue among actors involved in renewable electricity generation projects. Using the concepts of “shared visions” and “collaboration” developed by Transition Management scholars, this paper interrogates the challenges and success of the different provinces in integrating Indigenous communities as partners. A comparative study, based on interviews and a review of documents made by provincial governments and energy developers, has been carried to assess how Saskatchewan, a province located in the center south of Canada, could improve its existing supportive mechanisms toward a better integration of Indigenous perspectives in renewable electricity generation projects.This thesis demonstrates that important efforts have been carried by developmental agencies, provincial governments, and advocacy groups across Canada, including Saskatchewan, to advance Indigenous inclusion in renewable energy projects. They have contributed to change stakeholders’ perceptions on Indigenous communities which are increasingly considered. Moreover, Indigenous capacities to get involved in projects have largerly improved in the recent years thanks to provincial and federal programs.Nevertheless, in Sasaktchewan, actors’ sensitivity to Indigenous perspectives is still limited to experts and frontrunners. Compared to northern provinces and British Columbia, collaboration is still at its early stages and most times Indigenous communities must acquire a majority shares in projects to be integrated in decision making. The idea of a shared vision on sustainability is still far along the road and a stronger political stance promoting Indigenous involvement into renewable electricity projects is needed. In Saskatchewan compared to other provinces, indigenous communities face a stronger lack of interests and trust from energy developers to engage in partnerships due to lower public policies incentives. While provincial characteristics play a crucial role in defining political landscapes and interventionism possibilities, it seems that Saskatchewan could implement more ambitious mechanisms to promote shared sustainability visions and collaboration in renewable electricity projects.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».