MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7029524790

Kolme kriisiä ja kansalliset rahapelit : Yhteiskunnallisten murroskausien vaikutus suomalaisen rahapelijärjestelmän muotoutumiseen

2019· other· en· W7029524790 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueTyöväentutkimus Vuosikirja · 2019
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLinguistic research and analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAusterityLotteryLegalizationRecessionPeriod (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)Unemployment
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The study analyzes the historical formation of the Finnish gambling system with particular focus on non-economic factors related to the legalization of gambling. The development of the gambling system is examined from the perspective of three periods which turn out to be critical turning points in society. Firstly, the start of football pools during the year of the Winter War, 1940, and the subsequent Continuation War, and the “years of danger” at the end of the decade, when the agent networks of Finnish gambling corporations Veikkaustoimisto and Raha-automaattiyhdistys became organizations that monitored the moods and behaviors of citizens, in addition to their other functions. The second period was the rapid preparatory process of the lottery (Lotto) in 1970, a year of turbulent internal and foreign policy, and the subsequent period of strong social consensus development, when playing the lottery became a regular hobby of broad sections of the population. The third period of change was the recession of the 1990s. In the spirit of the liberalization of the financial markets of the previous decade, the range of gambling offered was expanded at that time toward the casino gambling ideal and gambling profits began to be used as a support of the austerity policies during the recession. The research showed that in addition to economic factors, one motive for the legalization of gambling was the nature of gambling, which relieves societal pressures and preserves the prevailing system; gambling was used to calm down the turmoil caused by the aforementioned crises. This applies especially to the first two periods of change, in which the activities of the extreme left were a key part of the societal unrest. From a theoretical perspective, gambling as a phenomenon that relieves societal pressures is examined in the study using Edward Devereux’s view, in particular, of gambling as a safety valve of a capitalist society. Gambling as a phenomenon that preserves the prevailing system is explored in greater depth using the system justification theory of social psychology. A second key research finding is also revealed from the perspective of preserving social order. Behind the scenes, during all three periods of social change the people who have significantly influenced the legalization of gambling or the directing of the use of gambling profits have been male-dominated elite groups that were seeking power; for its part, legalized gambling has been related to the legitimization of their goals and dominance in its own way. Another way of sustaining a dominant position has been propaganda; as a result, Finnish people have been taught to believe that gambling with Finnish gambling systems is a part of becoming a respectable citizen and a sacrifice for the survival of the country. In the 1940s the cadre of men consisted of comrades in arms acting in the spirit of the Winter War; in the 1970s they were fellow veterans united by a spirit of comradery and the ideals of a new direction in foreign policy, “Kekkonen’s men”; and in the 1990s they were the officials and ministers of the Ministry of Finance, sons of war veterans, who admired militarist traditions and violent means of solving problems. The study takes a deeper look at these man unions, who perceived themselves as saviors of society from the threatening power of chaos using the theory of hegemonic masculinity, which explores the ideological construction of male supremacy in Western societies. One of the results posited in the study is an interpretation according to which the strengthening of the gambling monopoly in 2017, which deviates from the European-wide development, can be partly explained by the historical formation and growth of the Finnish system through crises that threatened national existence and a social order based on traditional values. Historically, gambling and the organizations that have implemented it have been closely linked with the power networks that have significant influence on its legalization, defend the social order, and regulate conflict, as well as with their efforts to affect the mood and behavior of citizens. The study makes use of a variety of source material and a way of reading sources that is characteristic of modern historical research, in which interpretation and the researcher’s personal insight rise to complement the ideals of investigating the origin of sources and the factors that influence their emergence. Using diverse source material, gambling is contextualized as broadly as possible as part of the political and economic environment of each period under study.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,087
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,290

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0060,002
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0870,021

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTyöväentutkimus VuosikirjaMême sujetLinguistic research and analysisTravaux en français237 207