MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7029566239

Keynote Speaker: Josephine Burnett

2020· article· en· W7029566239 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueScholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBiomedical and Chemical Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPayload (computing)International Space StationSpace ShuttleTest (biology)LaunchedSpace (punctuation)Space researchNASA Chief ScientistSpace technology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Josephine Burnett is the director of Exploration Research and Technology Programs at NASA's John F. Kennedy Space Center in Florida. She is responsible for strategic leadership and program and project management for Kennedy support to the Exploration mission, which includes Space Life and Physical Sciences (SLPS), International Space Station (ISS), Advanced Exploration Systems (AES), and Space Technology (ST) Programs.\nBurnett began her career with NASA in 1987 as an aerospace/mechanical engineer integrating experiments onto Spacelab racks and pallets. In 1991, she became an experiment project engineer and led a team of engineers in the test and checkout of the United States Microgravity Laboratory–1 Spacelab Module. Burnett moved to an operations position in 1993 as a payload test director. In this position, she was responsible for overseeing shuttle payload testing for assigned payloads, including payload support for launch countdown.\nIn 1995, Burnett served as the center director management Intern and performed in this capacity until 1996 when she joined the Space Station Hardware Integration Office. For three years, she supported the test and checkout of the Canadian Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS) in Brampton, Ontario, and the Canadian portion of the Multi Element Integrated Test, after which time she was selected to lead the Element 6A Office as the acting chief.\nIn 2000, Burnett joined the ISS/Payload Processing Directorate as the chief of the Future Missions and International Partner Division. In this position, she led the office responsible for the advanced planning of ISS international elements, shuttle payloads, and concepts for improved ways to test payloads in the future. In 2003, she returned to the directorate as deputy for Program Management for the ISS and Payload Processing Directorate and the Kennedy Space Center. In this capacity, she supported the director in the development of organizational roles and responsibilities, as well the development of long-range organizational direction for Kennedy and ISS Program needs.\nBurnett was selected as a member of the Senior Executive Services Career Development Program (SESCDP) class of 2004 and completed the program in March 2006. She returned to Kennedy as the chief of the Systems Engineering and Integration Division for Kennedy’s Josephine Burnett Credits: NASA Design Engineering Directorate. In this capacity, she led a team of highly experienced systems engineers in support of the Constellation Ground Operations Project.\nBurnett then became the deputy director of the Space Transportation Planning office, providing strategic guidance and leadership for the program management and systems engineering and integration of the Constellation Block 1 Orion/Ares configuration to low-Earth orbit.\nMost recently, she was the director of the ISS Ground Processing and Research Project Office responsible for all ground processing of space station elements from around the world. These elements are operating in orbit and supporting the largest, most complex space station in human history.\nBurnett graduated from the University of Florida in 1987 with a B.S. in aerospace engineering and, in 1991, earned a Master of Science from the Florida Institute of Technology in space system operations. She is a native of Florida and lives in Merritt Island with her family.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,785
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,055
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueScholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)Même sujetBiomedical and Chemical ResearchTravaux en français237 207