Low-Lignin Alfalfa Evaluated in the Black Soil Zone
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A small-plot study was conducted at Lanigan (lat 51°51´N, long 105°02´W) SK, in the Black soil zone, to compare low-lignin Hi-Gest®360 alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) to a conventional alfalfa (AC Grazeland, check cultivar). Each cultivar was seeded in August 2017 as both a monoculture and binary mixture (binary) with AC Success hybrid bromegrass (HB). Plants were sampled in 2019 at 3 different maturity stages of alfalfa (1 = 10% bloom; 2 = 40% bloom or commercial harvest stage; and 3 = 100% bloom). Forage was harvested 27 June, and 8 and 29 July, 2019 for stage 1, stage 2 (11 d after stage 1), and stage 3 (21 d after stage 2), respectively. Treatments were replicated 4 times, a total of 48 plots with plot size of 6.2 — 1.2 m. Forage — maturity stage interaction was not observed (P > 0.05) for all measured parameters. AC Grazeland and Hi-Gest exhibited similar (P > 0.05) DMY (2978 ± 405 kg/ha). Likewise, AC Grazeland+HB and Hi-Gest+HB did not vary (P = 0.62; 9120 ± 647 kg /ha) in DMY. There was little difference between Hi-Gest and AC Grazeland (P > 0.05) in nutrient profile. As alfalfa maturity advanced, DMY increased (P < 0.05; 1940, 2970, 4023 kg/ha for stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Hi-Gest at stage 3 tended to be greater (P = 0.09; by 35.4%) in DMY than AC Grazeland at stage 2 (4235 kg/ha vs. 3127 kg/ha). In binary system, forages at stage 1 had lower (P < 0.05) DMY (6575 kg/ha) than those at stage 2 (9858 kg/ha) and stage 3 (10650 kg/ha), whereas, forages in stage 2 and stage 3 did not differ (P = 0.12) in DMY. However, in monoculture, forages at maturity stage 3 had lower crude protein (CP; 20.0 vs. 23.1%) and total digestible nutrients (TDN; 60.8 vs. 65.5%), but greater acid detergent fiber (ADF; 36.1 vs. 30.0%) than those at maturity stage 1. The acid detergent lignin (ADL) concentrations of Hi-Gest were 98.8%, 86.7%, and 99.2% (avg. 94.9%) of AC Grazeland alfalfa, for stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3, respectively. No differences (P > 0.05) were observed between AC Grazeland+HB and Hi-Gest+HB for nutrient profiles. The ADL concentration of Hi-Gest + HB was 106.3%, 93.7%, and 90.9% of (avg. 96.7%) AC Grazeland+HB, for the stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3, respectively. Hi-Gest alfalfa had greater (P < 0.05) effective degradable dry matter (EDDM; 7.2% more; 520 vs. 485 g/kg DM), effective degradable CP (EDCP; 14.3% more; 630 vs. 551 g/kg CP), and effective degradable neutral detergent fiber (EDNDF; 6.2% more; 265 vs. 249 g/kg NDF) relative to AC Grazeland alfalfa. In binary system, Hi-Gest+HB had numerically (P > 0.05) greater EDCP (8.2% more; 370 vs. 342 g/kg CP), but had similar EDDM (388.4 g/kg DM) and EDNDF (250 g/ kg NDF) relative to AC Grazeland+HB. In both mono- and binary systems, as the maturity advanced, EDDM, EDCP, and EDNDF declined (P < 0.05). The study further revealed that each percentage unit increase in ADL concentration, the main factor hindering cell wall digestion, decreased EDNDF by 2.1 percentage units (EDNDF, g/kg NDF = 252.54 “ 20.792 — ADL, % DM, r2 = 0.41, n = 48, P < 0.01). The stand establishment costs varied by treatment and were $458.70/ha ($185.60/ac), $233.44/ha ($94.47/ac), $351.50/ha ($142.25/ac), and $464.20/ha ($198.10/ac) for Hi-Gest, Grazeland, Grazeland+HB, and Hi-Gest+HB, respectively. The market value ranked from highest to lowest was AC Grazeland+HB > Hi-Gest+HB > Hi-Gest > AC Grazeland. Compared to conventional alfalfa (AC Grazeland) that was harvested at the commercial harvest stage (stage 2; 40% bloom), Hi-Gest alfalfa harvested at stage 3 (100% bloom) had $169.23/ha and $143.57/ha greater market value in mono- and binary system, respectively. Preliminary results suggest that Hi-Gest alfalfa (in both monoculture and binary systems) did not differ in DMY and nutrient profiles, but was greater in rumen degradation potential relative to AC Grazeland, suggesting Hi-Gest 360 alfalfa is a viable alternative legume in both monoculture and binary systems for the Black soil zone of Saskatchewan.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».