Metis perspectives on governance : a self-review of the Manitoba Metis Federation's governance practices through the lens of harvesting rights
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Good governance at the Métis national level requires grassroots leadership within local communities and that good governance also requires a results- based measures approach to demonstrate accountability and transparency.Specifically, the paper assessed the Manitoba Métis Federation's (MMF's) governance practices and how the MMF provided "good governance" to its membership on important issues that affect the Métis community in Manitoba.In doing so, this involved determining what "good governance" means for the Métis community and how this was interpreted by the Métis political leadership.Furthermore, good governance was assessed in terms of addressing the concerns of the Métis community, both at the grass roots level and at the institutional level.Finally, to examine how a specific policy issue is addressed within this governance framework, this thesis examined the relationship between good governance and harvesting rights, since the issue of harvesting rights is a major and current issue facing the Métis community in Manitoba.and a subsistence-based way of life which was the basis of the fur trade (Madden, Graham & Wilson, 2005,p.12).Since, economics played a major role in expansion of the fur trade and since the Métis were at the heart of the fur trade having played such a pivotal role, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples explains that:The special qualities and skills of the Métis population made them indispensable members of Aboriginal/non-Aboriginal economic partnerships, ond that association contributed to the shaping of their cultures.Using their lcnowledge of European and Aboriginal languages, their family connections and their wilderness skills, they helped to extend non-Aboriginal contacts deep into the Norîh American interior.As interpreters, diplomats, guides, couriers, freighters, traders and suppliers, the early M,átis people contributed massively to European penetration of North America (Métis Perspectives, 1996, p. I).Historically, a defining characteristic of the Métis is that they have been recognized for their ability to adapt to their surrounding environments in order to sustain themselves, their families, and the community at large.Although many Métis settlements were established at "fixed locations," the fur trade required extensive travel and networking.This translated into "growing kinship connections between the fixed settlements" (Madden et al, 2005,p.I2).As Madden et al argue, the identity of the Métis evolved from "more than just a mixing or adaptation of two divergent cultures.Through a process known as 'ethnogenesis', a distinct Métis culture, language (Michif), dress, music and way of life emerged" (2005, p. 13).Thus, the Métis no longer saw themselves simply "as an extension of Indian or European communities, but as a distinct Aboriginal group who operated and asserted themselves as such" (Madden et al,2005, p. 13).In the midst of the creation
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,013 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,014 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».