Narrative of the dispute between the Bishop of Ontario and the congregation of St. George's, Kingston, relative to the appointment of Dr. Lauder.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Before entering on the above narrative, in which it is intended to let the opposing parties speak for themselves as much as possible, it will be necessary to state a few matters of fact as to date and circum- stances, which are briefly as follows.Early in October, 1862, the late Rector, Dr. Stuart, died, and the right of presentation vested in the Synod of Ontario, which was summoned to meet at Ottawa in the beginning of November.For various reasons, it was supposed the Synod would present to this Rectory forthwith, whatever course it might see fit to pursue on the general question of patronage, and, as the city of Kingston was well represented in that body, no great anxiety was felt as to the result.But, as is now well known, the Synod finally determined, after a long and warm debate, on vesting the patronage entirely in the Bishop, the sanction of the lay majority being obtained, it is said, by the Bishop's promising not to use this power to make an appointment which would be distasteful to a congregation ; or, as he subsequently qualified it, that " he would not knowingly appoint a Rector who was decidedly disliked by the people."It is worthy of note that all the parishes in and about Kingston voted against this measure.Shortly afterwards (November 8th), the Synod broke up without any intimation whatever being given as to the person on whom the Rectory would be bestowed ', but as the Kingston Delegates had stated that the Bishop had promised to make no appointment likely to be distasteful to a congregation, and as it was universally supposed that his Lordship was well aware of Dr. Lauder's extreme unpopularity in that locality, no action was taken in the matter till it became known (on Monday, the 17th November) that the Bishop, who had only arrived in Kingston the Saturday previous, had appointed Dr. Lauder Rector of Kingston.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,031 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».