MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7030527544

New Platform Designs for Enabling Atomic Interactions in Solid and Gaseous States

2023· dissertation· en· W7030527544 sur OpenAlexafffund

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of Waterloo
Mots-clésResidual stressMicroelectromechanical systemsCurvatureDisplacement (psychology)FabricationField (mathematics)Stress (linguistics)Precision engineeringAtomic force microscopy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This dissertation is composed of two projects that explored two new platforms for measuring atomic interactions using simpler designs than in the literature. The first project of this dissertation designed a platform that enables the measurement of Lennard-Jones interaction between two solid surfaces in the form of Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) probe, using different techniques from Micro electrical Mechanical Systems (MEMS). MEMS by definition implies a mechanical and electrical parts of a system. There are many defects and imperfections that emerges on both sides of the system. On the mechanical side, one of the most common imperfections is residual stress, where most fabrication recipes are designed to eliminate it. Residual stress on films causes curvature (manifested as buckling, bending, etc.) for structures that are meant to be straight. On the electrical side, fringing field is considered very complicated to model, and too small to experimentally detect and separate from the main direct electrostatic field; hence, mostly it gets ignored in modelling. This project will try to make a benefit of these two unwanted phenomena combined (residual stress and fringing field) to make a new design for an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) probe (tip). The tip behavior is first analyzed and modeled statically using COMSOL software, then dynamically using Mathematica software. Both models were combined and compared with the experimental results obtained by an optical profilometer, scanning electron microscope, and a vibrometer. It was found that the model gave good predictions of the experimental behaviors, except with higher displacement amplitude of the model than that of experiment. The reason is due to the purposeful curvature of the probe (cantilever) induced by residual stress, which caused some parts of the probe not to be on the same level with the electrode; hence, weakened its actual response experimentally. Since use of correction factors to account for fringing field is nothing new, a correction reduction factor was introduced to lower the model response to match that of the experiment. The results show that the structure of the actuator (parallel plate or a single comb finger) is not of importance in modeling fringing field, as we have applied literature force modeled for non-curved parallel plate capacitors for our curved comb-finger structure and got identical response to our comb-finger derived new force with a matter of just a correction factor (i.e. free parameter). We have also shown that the curvature equation is unnecessary in the model, and the behavior of the curved probe can be modeled as a straight one. \nThe second project of this dissertation is another simple design for enhancing light-matter interaction between a single laser beam and an atomic gas (cesium) in what is known as cavity Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). Increasing the interaction between light and matter is inspired by the desire to unravel more understanding about the nature of both interacting entities: light and matter. This can be enabled by engineering necessary platforms where such maximally interacting light and matter can be realized. Usually there are two ways to increase such interaction: 1) increase transverse confinement, and 2) increase the interaction time (in addition to increasing the number of atoms). Each of these two ways is done in a separate platform design. This second project proposes a new platform that can have both ways: increasing both transverse confinement and interaction time by using the hollow core of photonic crystal fiber as the interaction host (hence blocking light from propagating transversally by the photonic bandgap effect), while the light will be bounced back and forth against the atomic gas, not by the conventional Fabry-Perot cavity, but instead by inscribing a Bragg grating mirror on the walls of the hollow core (hence, increase interaction time). The unblocked hollow core will allow easier atomic gas insertion. Different mirror inscription methods were studied, and the best method was employed using a photoresist-assisted layer, instead of direction inscription on the core silicon wall. Initial numerical modeling was done using Lumerical software that gave the Bragg parameters corresponding to the best Bragg mirror reflection which was up to 99.99% reflectivity from only about 300 Bragg periods (shorter mirror) corresponding to only ~100 µm penetration depth. Moreover, since the hollow core photonic crystal fiber is of a high cost, an injection port was designed and built to enable low fiber material loss caused by conventional injection.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: Méthodes
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,015

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207