MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7032341356

Recollecting Home

2013· article· en· W7032341356 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueRIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology) · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueArchitecture, Design, and Social History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSet (abstract data type)Perspective (graphical)Quarter (Canadian coin)Simple (philosophy)Process (computing)Aside
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I went home, to the area west of Boston, prior to the spring quarter of my first year as a graduate student, with intention of rediscovering an untapped part of my visual experience. I was hoping to find new inspiration, something from which to extract new forms. It was a simple response to a basic frustration with the design process I had become accustomed to, and a growing unease with the nature of our techno-centric society. When I began making furniture, I immersed myself in its history, and it was out of this immersion that I drew inspiration. Making and the history of furniture were aptly married, and were well suited to a certain way of learning about both the history and the working of wood. I had begun to feel that after designing and building furniture for almost a decade in this way that it was no longer a completely satisfying approach. I was compelled to search my own history in an effort to bring a more personal perspective to my work. With this goal in mind, I set out to explore place, and the significance of my aesthetic experience. A brief but influential trip home was necessary in that pursuit. Living in Rochester presented an opportunity to examine home from a fresh perspective, and this simple trip, a long weekend really, served to jump-start the search for a new approach. I grew up in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, a town that had once been home to a whole host of mills and small factories, a town with a past not unlike many in New England. To begin to re-examine my visual history, I sought out the remnants of the history of the place I came from. I began to document them, capturing snap shots of familiar things and places. I collected them, not knowing what might come of it. The things that I found were simple yet significant: mill buildings, smokestacks, granite markers, hitching posts, cast iron ornamentation and implements, monuments, millstones, scattered machine parts, in addition to other industrial and cultural leavings. These markers of another time pepper the New England landscape, and while many of these leavings have been reduced to quaint decoration, they continue to quietly exist. They are at once emblematic of an industrial past, and reminders of the forward momentum of time and progress. I propose with this thesis to build a body of work that draws upon home as its primary source. Home has played a major role in my visual experience. However, it has been only recently that I have begun to unearth the relevance in my work of the place where I grew up. Home is a place filled with relics and remnants emblematic of another society, its philosophies and its ethics. Their roles have changed, yet they continue to have a place in our world. For me, not only are these things markers of home and its broader meaning; they have become symbols of work and making. By exploring the relevance of the architecture, artifacts and implements of our recent past I will seek out their new significance. I will examine the visual, the metaphorical, the literal and the lyrical, investing the results of this search in the creation of new work. My aim is not to recreate objects from our past, but to use them in an effort to discover something about the relationship between form and meaning. In addition to the aesthetic side of this investigation, it is my suspicion that it will also lead to a discovery of something deeply personal about home.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,930
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,885

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology)Même sujetArchitecture, Design, and Social HistoryTravaux en français237 207