Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A one day event focusing on contemporary artists’ engagement with the Five Sisters’ Bings and specifically John Latham's approach to site from above as manifested in his 1975–76 APG placement with the Scottish Development Office. With contributions from Joy Sleeman, Katherine Jackson, Nicky Bird and Onya McCausland. \n \nWhilst on placement as part of the Artist Placement Group with the Scottish Development Agency in the 1970s John Latham was invited to suggest solutions for the problem of derelict land outside Edinburgh. When asked ‘from which perspective would he be looking at Scotland’, he apparently pointed to a map of the country and responded ‘from this distance’. The aerial viewpoint, from war-time reconnaissance photography to our contemporary dependence on satellite navigational systems such as Google Earth, allows for a new consideration of the Earth’s aesthetic form; a perspective so compelling that it inspired artists from the 1960s, most significantly John Latham, to consider the site itself a work of art. However as conceptual art, land art and minimalism developed, the formal qualities of site became increasingly linked to its materiality, its complex natural, social and economic context could only begin to be understood through the holistic perspective of the aerial. \n \nThis event brings together artists and art historians who have developed research and practices born from a focused examination and integration of landscape and land use in relation to the aerial view. In the year celebrating the 50th anniversary of the moon landings, and as Google Earth becomes increasingly ubiquitous, this event will explore how visions of the Earth through the aerial have shaped consciousness and our sense of place and experiences of landscape. Building on evidence and material housed at the John Latham archive at Flat Time House this event presents significant current research findings and artworks that foreground consideration to longer temporal spans that question the idea that memory acquires depth when entangled with the physicality of site. \n \nThis is a one day symposium where invited speakers will present their research in the form of papers, performance and artwork, followed by a panel discussion and questions from the audience. \n \nKatherine Jackson is a doctoral candidate whose institutional affiliation is University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Her thesis is on the Artist Placement Group, whose founders included Barbara Steveni and John Latham. \n \nNicky Bird is Reader in Contemporary Photographic Practice at The Glasgow School of Art. Her work investigates the contemporary relevance of found photographs, the hidden histories of archives and specific sites. \n \nJoy Sleeman is Professor of Art History and Theory at the Slade School of Fine Art, whose research concerns the histories of sculpture and landscape, especially 1960s Land art. A current project, 'Future Land Art' concerns both the future of Land art and notions of futurity and anticipation in Land art from the 1960s and 1970s. \n \nDr. Onya McCausland is Leverhulme ECR fellow at the Slade School of Fine Art. Her practice exploits access to satellite navigational systems to examine perception of landscape with a particular focus on viewing materials and processes underway in otherwise hidden ex-coal mine sites across the UK.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».