Prédicteurs cognitivo-affectifs de la douleur et de l’ajustement de couples dont la femme souffre de douleur génito-pelvienne
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pain during sexual intercourse, now classified under the single term of genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), would affect up to 34% of young women and 45% of older women. Provoked vestibulodynia, a chronic pain elicited via pressure to the vulvar vestibule or attempted vaginal penetration, is the most common form of pain during intercourse. Controlled studies have shown that provoked vestibulodynia has multiple deleterious physical, psychological, sexual and relational impacts and thus greatly affects women’s quality of life, as well as their partners’. Provoked vestibulodynia occurs in the very intimate context of sexual intercourse. In that context, women’s self-concept could be negatively affected. Moreover, research among couples with provoked vestibulodynia has demonstrated the role of interpersonal factors in the modulation of women’s pain and associated consequences for both partners. Considering the documented efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic pain, including provoked vestibulodynia, and the importance of the relational context for this condition, a new cognitive-behavioural couple therapy has been developed by our team. It is the first treatment to take into account the interpersonal context of provoked vestibulodynia. Furthermore, we lack empirical evidence on mediators of change of cognitive-behavioural therapy for provoked vestibulodynia and on positive psychological factors that could foster better adjustment for women and their partners. The objective of this thesis was to use a dyadic perspective to examine the role of self-compassion in the adjustment of couples coping with provoked vestibulodynia, as well as the roles of both partners’ pain self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing as mediators of change in cognitive-behavioural couple therapy. The first study examined the associations between self-compassion of women with provoked vestibulodynia and their partners and their depression, anxiety, sexual distress and relational satisfaction as well as women’s pain intensity during intercourse. Forty-eight couples with provoked vestibulodynia completed self-report questionnaires. For both women and their partners, higher levels of self-compassion were associated with their own lower anxiety and depression. When partners reported higher levels of self-compassion, they were more satisfied with their relationship, and both partners and women reported lower sexual distress. No significant association was found for pain during intercourse. The second article examined pain self-efficacy and catastrophizing as mediators of therapeutic change regarding pain, sexual distress and sexual function in cognitive-behavioural couple therapy for provoked vestibulodynia. Because cognitive-behavioural couple therapy did not improve significantly more pain self-efficacy relative to lidocaine treatment, this variable was not included in subsequent mediation models. In women with provoked vestibulodynia, greater decreases in pain catastrophizing in cognitive-behavioural couple therapy, as compared to the lidocaine control condition, mediated reductions in pain intensity and sexual distress as well as improvement of sexual function. In partners, greater decreases in pain catastrophizing in cognitive-behavioural couple therapy, as compared to the lidocaine control condition, mediated reductions in sexual distress and improvement of sexual function. Partners’ pain catastrophizing reductions also mediated women’s decrease in sexual distress. Implications of results, as well as theoretical, methodological and clinical contributions of the thesis are discussed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,082 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle