Relationships Between Key Performance Indicators Across Four Swimming Strokes and by Distances in Competitive Swimmers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Key performance indicators (KPIs) are skill-based metrics, used by coaches and athletes to adjust technique and develop race strategies. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of key performance indicators (KPIs), such as stroke rate (SR;#/s), stroke count (SC;#), stroke length (SL;m) and kick frequency (KF;#/s) on total swim time (s), across four swimming strokes (butterfly, backstroke, breaststroke, freestyle) of the same swim distance, and within a swimming stroke between swim distances (50m and 100 m). Varsity-caliber competitive swimmers (n=12 males; 19yrs1.4) were recruited. Anthropometric measures including height (m), seated height (m), weight (kg), wingspan (m), hand length (m) and leg length (m) were recorded. Shoulder and ankle range of motion (ROM) measurements and a Y-balance test (YBT) were conducted to profile upper and lower limb mobility. Athletes completed four swim sessions; each session consisted of a standardized warm up, 50m kick, 50m pull, 50m swim and 100m swim distances per swimming stroke. Swimming KPIs and total swim time (s) were collected by a portable Triton 2 device (TritonWear, ON, Canada). A GoPro Hero 8 device (GoPro, California, USA) collected underwater video to facilitate calculating KF (#/s). Descriptives were calculated for all variables across all four swimming strokes and two swim distances. Pearson product-moment correlations revealed significant relationships between select anthropometrics and ROM and performance times (p<0.005), suggesting that both anthropometric and ROM measures have the potential to influence swim performance times. A series of repeated-measure ANOVAs with Greenhouse-Geisser corrections revealed significant differences in select KPIs [SR (#/s), SC (#), SL (m) and KF (#/s)] across the four swimming strokes and between 50m and 100m swim distances within a swimming stroke (p<0.05), suggesting that both swimming strokes and swim distances may utilize different KPI related strategies. A multiple regression analyses was conducted to identify the contribution of pull time (s) versus kick time (s) to total swim time (s) within 50m swim distance and each swimming stroke. Percent contributions were calculated and revealed differences by each stroke. Data-driven metrics obtained during swim performances facilitated a better understanding of the relationships between KPIs, anthropometrics, ROM, and YBT measures. Furthermore, metrics provided support to adjust select KPIs relative to an athlete’s anthropometrics. These sport specific skill-based metrics can empower coaches and athletes to use KPIs to optimize athlete potential and target performance goals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».