SAPUVET and SAPUVETNET projects: a contribution to the understanding of the prudent use of antimicrobials
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The objectives of the projects is working are the development of strategies to improve learning and teaching VPH. The main results of the project can be summarized in: the proposal of a common VPH curriculum, to design teaching material as case studies or a manual on VPH, the coordination of some e-conferences and a journal “One Health”. All the materials can be freely distributed or used for distance learning by the way of the web site. Some activities and materials are related to the increase of antimicrobials resistant microorganisms and their role in public health. These activities are: 1- Development of the chapter “Bacterial resistance; control strategies, good practices and prudent use of antimicrobials” in the manual of Veterinary Public Health- One Health. Organization of two open electronic conferences to discuss the problem of the use of antimicrobials in veterinary medicine, the associated risks to their use in public health and the alternatives to apply based on the prudent use of antimicrobials. The e-conference Local practices in production and animal health, with special reference to the use of medicines and the resistance to antibiotics: consequences in veterinary public health" took place in march 2007 and the e-conference “PRUDENT USE OF ANTIMICROBIALS IN ANIMALS: SOLUTION OR UTOPIA?” took place in september 2010, both of them using the moodle platform and involving students, lecturers and professionals from Canada, Latin America, Africa and Europe. In this last e-conference, the general opinion agrees with the use of antimicrobials for therapeutic and prophylactic purposes. However, their use as additives was not consensual, both among group members as other participants. Some opinions defended that the use of some specific antimicrobials as additives makes sense in some circumstances, as long as with a serious and strict control. But all professionals agree that veterinarians should work based in sanitary planning and in preventive medicine to avoid the use of antimicrobials, and the absolute need for multicenter research, which will can take more informed decisions. It was also introduced the concern of the inappropriate use of other chemical products and its relation with antimicrobial resistance; related with this, all the group agree with the most correct use of the term “antimicrobials” to describe any substance that kill microorganisms, including natural compounds, produced or not by microorganisms and synthetic antimicrobials compounds, instead of the term “antibiotic”, more restricted, although previously used by the group. SAPUVETNET members have also published a manuscript in the first volume of the journal “One Health” called: “the problem of antibiotics resistance in public health”. A group of case studies concerning to health problems linked to the use of antimicrobials have been included in the learning materials: Multiresistant Salmonella enterica Thyphimurium in human and animal populations; Multi-resistance to antibiotics of porcine origin; Relapsed multirresistant infection in a Golden dog and Residuum of antimicrobial substances in bovine meet and viscera. The main conclusions were: there are differences in the use of antibiotics between countries, particularly considering different ways of animal health management and hygiene; regulation of the use of antibiotics at legal standpoint and surveillance programs are necessary, ethics of health workers are key to solve the problem. These materials are tested actually by the lecturers of the Universities involved in SAPUVETNET project.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,020 | 0,025 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,012 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».