A sacola de medicamentos: reflexões sobre as práticas de assistência farmacêutica em unidades de saúde da atenção básica
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: the pharmacist's work in Primary Care has traditionally aimed more at the pharmacies logistics and supply issues in Health Units rather than the user needs regarding the use of their medicines. This gap was gradually noticed, not only by the pharmaceutical professionals, but also by other professionals of the health teams, as reports emerged of users with great difficulty in handling and understanding their drug treatment. There was a demand and a space that the pharmaceutical professional could occupy. The approach of this professional to the teams of Primary Care, as responsible for the shared care of these users, was facilitated in the Family Health Support Centers. Therefore, the Pharmaceutical Assistance actions have expanded to those related to Pharmaceutical Care, considered as a model of pharmaceutical practice and that is attentive to attitudes, ethical values, behaviors, skills, commitments and co-responsibilities in disease prevention, health promotion and recovery, in an integrated manner to the health teams. This requires a direct interaction with the user through qualified hearing, aiming at gaining users autonomy with regard to medication use. In addition to be a hearing space, the group experience can offer opportunities for the exchange of ideas and experiences in this direction. Objectives: To monitor a group experience, which uses the GAM strategy – Autonomous Medication Management in a Family Health Unit of the Municipality of Santos, with users who have chronic non communicable diseases, observing their effects on medication management. Identify barriers and facilitators in the medication use, the importance of the medication for these users and the effects of the group on their autonomy and prominent role. Method: a qualitative study using the intervention research with a group of users with chronic diseases who use polymedication with reference to the Brazilian Autonomous Medication Management Guide .Autonomous Medication Management Guide initially created in Canada with users of Mental Health services and subsequently adapted to the Brazilian context proposes a co-management of medication among teams, users, family and community. Results and Discussion: it was found the importance of ensuring spaces for discussion and learning among users with chronic diseases and workers, enabling a better understanding of drug treatment, which contributes to the pharmaceutical care process, generating increased possibility of negotiation and consequently autonomy for the user. The GAM themes are important triggers for these reflections. The "bag" of medicines points to the medication as a commodity and incentive to consumption, as well as a criticism of the way drugs are being dispensed, causing in many cases non-adherence to treatment. As barriers were encountered, difficulties arose in the formation of the groups and in the presence of a larger number of professionals from the teams to increase co-management. As a suggestion for new studies the topic of medicalization can be more discussed in the teams as a way of overcoming the assistance model, which has so far been established especially with regard to the use of medicines.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».