MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7034105377

State Estimation and Thermal Fault Detection for Lithium-Ion Battery Packs: A Deep Neural Network Approach

2023· dissertation· en· W7034105377 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAvian ecology and behavior
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésBattery (electricity)Fault detection and isolationArtificial neural networkState of chargeReliability (semiconductor)Feedforward neural networkFault (geology)Energy (signal processing)Energy management
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Recently, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have achieved wide acceptance for various energy storage applications, such as electric vehicles (EVs) and smart grids. As a vital component in EVs, the performance of lithium-ion batteries in the last few decades has made significant progress. The development of a robust battery management system (BMS) has become a necessity to ensure the reliability and safety of battery packs. In addition, state of charge (SOC) estimation and thermal models with high-fidelity are essential to ensure efficient BMS performance. The SOC of a LIB is an essential factor that should be reported to the vehicle’s electronic control unit and the driver. Inaccurate reported SOC impacts the reliability and safety of the lithium-ion battery packs (LIBP) and the vehicle. Different algorithms are used to estimate the SOC of a LIBP, including measurement-based, adaptive filters and observers, and data-driven; however, there is a gap in feasibility studies of running these algorithms for multi-cell LIBP on BMS microprocessors. On the other hand, temperature sensors are utilized to monitor the temperature of the cells in LIBPs. Using a temperature sensor for every cell is often impractical due to cost and wiring complexity. Robust temperature estimation models can replace physical sensors and help the fault detection algorithms by providing a redundant monitoring system. In this thesis, an accurate SOC estimation and thermal modeling for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are presented using deep neural networks (DNNs). Firstly, two DNN-based SOC estimation algorithms, including a feedforward neural network (FNN) enhanced with external filters and a recurrent neural network with a long short-term memory layer (LSTM), are developed and benchmarked versus an extended Kalman filter (EKF) and EKF with recursive least squares filter (EKF-RLS) SOC estimation algorithms. The execution time of EKF, EKF-RLS, FNN, and LSTM SOC estimation algorithms with similar accuracy was found to be 0.24 ms, 0.25 ms, 0.14 ms, and 0.71 ms, respectively. The DNN SOC estimation algorithms were also demonstrated to have lower RAM use than the EKFs, with less than 1 kB RAM required to run one estimator. The proposed FNN and LSTM models are also used to predict the surface temperature of different lithium-ion cells. These DNN models are shown to be capable of estimating temperature with less than 2 ⁰C root mean square error for challenging low ambient temperature drive cycles and just 0.3 ⁰C for 4C rate fast charging conditions. In addition, a DNN model which is trained to estimate the temperature of a new battery cell, is found to still have a very low error of just 0.8 ⁰C when tested on an aged cell. Finally, an integrated physics, and neural network-based battery pack thermal model (LP+FNN) is developed and used to detect and identify different thermal faults of a LIBP. The proposed fault detection and identification method is validated using various thermal faults, including fan system failure, airflow lower and higher than setpoint, airflow blockage of submodule and temperature sensor reading faults. The proposed method is able to detect different cooling system faults within 10 to 35 minutes after fault occurrence. In addition, the proposed method demonstrated being capable of detecting temperature sensor reading offset and scale faults of ±3 ⁰C and ±0.15% or more, respectively with 100% accuracy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,935
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,203
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMacSphere (McMaster University)Même sujetAvian ecology and behaviorTravaux en français237 207