The spirit of calumny and slander examin'd, chastised and expos'd : in a letter to a malicious libeller more particularly address'd to Mr. George Ridpath ...
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Have good information from feveral Perfbns of known integrity here at London, that you are the Author of two abufive Pamphlets by which you endeavour to defame our Kinjgs, Parliaments, and Nobles, fuch as we had in Scotland before the le Revolution.Our Kings were perjured Tyrants, and K. Charles IL knew that he himfelf had forfeited his Title to the Crown*i Our Parliaments were but pack d* Conti- Clubs,* company of flavifli Parafites, that contributed all they could to nuat. the ruin of our Liberties,Civiland Religious; and confequently our Nobility can deferve no better Character, who made fo great a Figure in all our Parliaments.As for the Epifcopal Clergy whether Bimopsor Presbyters, you give them fo many names, that it is a wonder you did not think fuch a defpicable company of men below your Notice.The Book which you call your Continuation, raoft of it is levelled againft one particular man ; and when 1 undertake his Defence ( if that be neceflaryj I find that the reading over your book,and tranfcri- bing fo many parts of it was all the toil I was likely to undergo, and tho you call him whom you fancy to be your Adverfary a man of un- governable paffion; yet I muft tell you that he could not but be mad to the laft degree, if he were angry at the names you give him, fince they of the firft quality in Europe, nave no fairer quarter at your hands;A Scribkr. a Pedant, a Hawker, a Villain, an Afs^a n Ignoramus, a Blun* derer, are all ofthem words that he can hear with patience, when his Superiours are not better treated.One may modeftly conclude that you are very angry, and that's a greater punilhment than any of your Adverfaries can inflict upon you.The Author of the Tofifcript to the Apolozy for the Clergy of Scotland, told you already, that he was not at all concerned in that Scuffle between you and your Antagonift, nor is he likely to offer his mediation to end your Debate ; and he is ftill of the opinion, that he can employ his time better than to'read again your Anfwer, or the Book that occafioned it.His Tofifcript is a fliort Epifto- lary account of the firft, or rather a Character of the prefent methods of Fresbytery, in imitation of their Predeceffors, than any particular view of your Book, and I am content that you impute this to his ig- norance or weaknefs or what elfeyou'pleale to call it.It is very odd that you fhould think that you have power to funamon any body to the Prefs when you pleafe, even when you lurk behind the Curtains.You B take '\C 3 ] region written by the * Bifhop of Rochester, and there * A, true Account of you may fee with your own Eyes feveral authentick Ethe horrid Confpiracy a- vidences, upon record, againft C.of C. and I muft tell \'n(t the King , &c.you that Sir George Mackenzie needed not that Gentle-x b EJit % id*?'*' man's Atliftance to re commend him to the prefent Court, if he had been ambitious to -have been a Favorite; and if he told C. of C that 'he had done him an Injury , and begg'd him par- don, how came this Confeffion to be made publick?if he to whom it was firft revealed, under truft, fpread it abroad, he is guilty of fomething that no Gentleman will readily own ; but the plain truth is Sir George Mackenzie never told him any fuch thing, after the manner you reprefent it s and he had very good reafon to exped:that the Witneftes againft C. of C. would judicially depone jn pub- lick, the very lame things that they aflerted in private ; and if you pleafe you may remember that tHbre is a greater difference between Sir George Mackenzie and your felf, than between Mr. Rutherford and thole of our Clergy you trample upon
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».