Una elecció de secretaris de l'aljama de jueus de Cervera en 1485
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
While documentation related to the Jews who inhabited Cervera for centuries\nis in abundant supply, texts that shed light on the internal running of the\nJewish aljama are rather scarce. Recently, however, such a text has been unearthed. Written in Catalan on Saturday 23 July 1485, it consists of the minutes\nof a meeting and records the election of the two secretaries of the aljama, \nplus that of another person, referred to as the «third party», who would be required\nto intervene in the process of choosing councillors in the event of any\ndisagreement between the two secretaries.\nAccording to the document, a transcript of which is provided at the end of\nthe article, the electoral procedure was as described below.\nOn the aforementioned date, a meeting took place in the school in Cerveras\nupper Jewish quarter (the usual venue for such activities). The Jews in attendance\nwere Mossé de Quercí and Benvenist Sullam, in their capacity as secretaries;\nthe doctor Cresques Adret, the doctor Issac de Quercí, the doctor Jucef\nCavaller, Jucef Baró Creixent, Bonjuà Adret, Bonet Bellshom and Issac Samuel\nSullam, in their capacity as councillors; and the doctor Samuel Cavaller, Jafudà\nde Quercí and the doctor Jacob de Quercí, in their capacity as three of the largest\nlandowners and, consequently, three of the highest taxpayers. \nFirst of all, they swore an oath, one after another, whilst touching a text containing\nthe Ten Commandments, in the hope that they would choose wisely\nwhen electing two secretaries from among the Jews of Cerveras aljama. Voting \nwas conducted in secret. Jucef Cavaller was elected as one of the secretaries by\nvirtue of receiving the greatest number of votes, while there was a tie between\nIssac de Quercí and Bonjuà Adret for the second secretarys post. Votes were\ncast again to decide between the two. At this time of asking, Issac de Quercí\nreceived the most votes and was thus elected secretary.\nThe two elected secretaries, Jucef Cavaller and Issac de Quercí, subsequently\nswore an oath, whilst touching the scroll, to govern the aljama in a fitting manner,\nto act in its best interests and to protect the privileges it had been granted\nby various monarchs over the course of time.\nWith the two new secretaries having been elected and sworn in, the outgoing\nsecretaries, Mossé de Quercí and Benvenist Sullam, designated five Jews\nfrom among the largest landowners and highest taxpayers, specifically the three\nmentioned earlier (Jafudà de Quercí, Samuel Cavaller and Jacob de Quercí)\nplus Mossé de Quercí and Mossé Sullam de Saporta.\nNext, the two secretaries (presumably the outgoing secretaries), the seven\ncouncillors and five of the largest landowners swore the usual oath and elected\nthe «third party», i.e. the person who would intervene in the councillor selection\nprocess in the event of the two secretaries failing to reach an agreement. Jafudà\nde Quercí received the greatest number of votes and was elected to the post.\nThe content of the document ends at this point. It appears that the councillors\nwere chosen at a later date. By way of conclusion, it can be said that the text described herein (a transcript of which is provided) is of great interest in that it\nreveals how the secretaries of Cerveras Jewish aljama were elected in the final\nperiod of its existence. A mere seven years later, royal orders would lead to the\naljama vanishing forever, along with all the others on the Iberian peninsula.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».