MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7034735945

When town left gown: A collective family biography of settler colonists from Oxford, England to Canterbury, New Zealand, 1850 to 1870 : A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master Master of Applied Science at Lincoln University

2022· dissertation· en· W7034735945 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueLincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) · 2022
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMathematics
ThématiqueFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUnderemploymentBiographyPopulationRhetoricMicrohistoryUnit (ring theory)Quarter (Canadian coin)Urban sociologyPosition (finance)Poor reliefSquire
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This ‘collective family biography’, taking the family as the unit of analysis, is a microhistory which contextualises the lives, before and after migration, of a group of at least 100 settler colonists from Oxford, England or its close environs, who arrived in Canterbury between 1850 and 1870. The evidence, using the tools of the historian of the family, reveals that these ‘ordinary’ people were representative of a mobile, urban and consumer-oriented English society embracing a continuum of mainly self-employed artisans and traders through to teachers, servants, domestic workers and labouring wage-earners. They were also significantly affiliated, whether by kinship, marriage, parish, occupation, education, freemasonry or religious denomination. Many retained these connections throughout their lives. In an age before compulsory education was mandated, they were also overwhelmingly literate. The ‘push’ factors that influenced their migration decisions included underemployment during the Oxford University holidays and economic stagnation caused by intensifying competitive trading conditions resulting from the passing of the Municipal Corporations Act (UK) 1835 which relaxed restrictions on who could trade in the city. Other social pressures were public health and housing problems brought about by rapid population growth from 1800 and the ensuing effects of the coming of the railway in 1844. This resulted in the decline of the canal trade, Oxford ceasing to be a national transport hub, and quicker travel time to London. For the first group of thirty-two migrants ‘pull’ attractions, as expressed in the promotional rhetoric of the Canterbury Association, included the perceived absence of a Māori population, the promise of economic advancement either through land ownership or the possibility of eventual ownership, and cultural replication by way of schools and churches. Later ‘pull’ factors for a second group who migrated from the mid-1850s to 1870 were largely chain migration inducements. On their arrival these families engaged in a variety of occupations including teaching, printing, farming, brewing, building, storekeeping, domestic and labouring work. The transition to settler colonial life in this eruptive phase of settlement was not necessarily easy, and the evidence suggests an initial perpetuation of the town and gown social divide. Some families experienced dramatic reversals of fortune and a significant number died well before, and during middle age, either through accident, infection or chronic illness. Two women appear to have had unstable lives marked by social marginalisation. However, the evidence overall suggests these were a socially cohesive people strongly bonded to their families, churches and local communities. Seventy-six people (out of a total of 101 who left England) remained in Canterbury and many were active in civic and church affairs. One was a Member of the House of Representatives from 1878 to 1890 and was known for his liberal sympathies, pious good works and as a booster for South Canterbury’s economic development.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,457
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,909

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,005
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,120
Tête enseignante GPT0,312
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University)Même sujetFractional Differential Equations SolutionsTravaux en français237 207