Wise Women and Witches: Women and the Supernatural in Nineteenth-century Scottish Writing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation foregrounds the relationship between women and the supernatural in nineteenth-century Scottish writing. Writers of both fictive and non-fictive texts used the supernatural to explore ideologies about gender. I argue that many used the supernatural to explore issues of power, agency, and consent, particularly with regards to women’s rights, roles, and responsibilities in nineteenth-century Scotland. Authors and collectors ultimately suggested that women held power in their speech, craft, and bodies – though they debated the extent of those powers. \nI argue that writers and collectors used the supernatural to explore both seventeenth- and nineteenth-century ideologies about gender and suggest that both were concerned with issues of cultural identity, agency, and consent. Renewing their focus on the witch-hunts, nineteenth-century writers centered both women and the supernatural at the heart of this discussion. Nineteenth-century Scots sought to distance themselves from their “superstitious” ancestors while also celebrating these unique and “authentic” representations of Scottish culture. \nI explore two case studies of ethnographic writing by women, suggesting that women writers often had to navigate criticism focused on their gender rather than the merits of their work. Women writers had to perform femininity carefully – creating their authority while maintaining their reputations. Women contributed to the development of the genre, and their writing reflects several shared concerns: (super)natural landscapes, religion and “superstition.” and marriage. \nExamining representations of women as storytellers reveals that many collectors or authors who constructed these representations were negotiating who should have power over which stories were told and how stories were received. Editors, collectors, translators, and authors emphasize or deemphasize their presence to control cultural narratives – including narratives about gender. \nI argue that collectors and writers turned to nineteenth-century texts which used female figurations of the supernatural to explore how women’s powers were embodied. (Re)contextualizing nineteenth-century writing that claimed to document beliefs about the supernatural alongside fictive material shows how these texts were used to legitimise or de-legitimise movements and arguments, supporting or detracting from value systems. These texts suggest that women held power in their bodies, crafts, and speech, but that they had to negotiate use of these powers carefully.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».