Стареча астенія як предиктор тяжкості перебігу періопераційного періоду в пацієнтів похилого та старечого віку
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of the diagnosis of senile asthenia using the Edmonton Frail scale in emergency abdominal surgery and to determine its impact on the severity of the perioperative period. Materials and methods. The study included 81 patients with acute cholecystitis on the background of gallstone disease, who were assessed for senile asthenia using the Edmonton Frail scale. For the reliability of the obtained results, only patients who were urgently hospitalized to the surgical department with gynecology beds of the emergency hospital with clinical symptoms of acute cholecystitis were included. All patients received treatment in only one department and according to the standards and clinical protocols of this clinic. Based on the Edmonton Frail score, all patients were divided into two groups. The comparison group included 50 (61.7 %) patients who did not have senile asthenia. The main group included 31 (38.3 %) patients diagnosed with senile asthenia. Results. Surgical treatment in both groups was carried out on an urgent basis using total intravenous anesthesia with artificial lung ventilation. According to the type of surgical intervention in both groups, preference was given to minimally invasive methods. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the comparison group was performed in 49 (98.0 %) patients, and only one patient (2.0 %) was converted and operation continued from the mini-access. In the main group, all surgical interventions were performed by the laparoscopic method, U = 759.50, P = 0.8841. Analyzing the results of the duration parameters and the need for prolonged mechanical ventilation, it can be seen that it progressively increases in patients with asthenia: in the comparison group 61.50 (48.00; 75.00) minutes, and in the main 93.84 (60.00; 80.00), U = 513.50, P = 0.0112. Also, we noted that in patients with senile asthenia, the number of postoperative complications increases: in the comparison group, there were only 2 (4.0 %) postoperative complications, while in the main group – 7 (22.6 %), U = 556.00, Р = 0.0337. Summarizing the results, it can be seen that due to increase of the frequency of postoperative complications and increase of the need for prolonged artificial ventilation of the lungs, the length of hospital stay of patients with senile asthenia increased: in the comparison group it was 7.9 ± 2.2 days, and in the main group 9.7 ± 3.2 days, U = 530.50, P = 0.0177. Conclusions. In our opinion, the Edmonton Frail scale is effective in diagnosing the severity of senile asthenia in elderly and senile patients in emergency abdominal surgery due to its simplicity and speed of use. The overall severity of the condition, heart failure in patients with senile asthenia lead to increase in the duration of surgery and the total duration of artificial lung ventilation: in the comparison group 39.52 (30.00; 45.00) minutes, while in the main group 49.19 (35.00; 50.00) minutes, U = 482.50, P = 0.0046. The duration of mechanical ventilation also differed significantly, in the comparison group 61.50 (48.00; 75.00) minutes, and in the main – 93.84 (60.00; 80.00), U = 513.50, P = 0.0112. The severity of senile asthenia negatively affects the course of the perioperative period, the frequency of postoperative complications increases: 2 (4.0 %) patients in the comparison group, while in the main group of 7 (22.6 %) patients, U = 556.00, P = 0.0337 and, as a consequence, the duration of inpatient treatment increases: in the comparison group it was 7.9 ± 2.2 days, in the main – 9.7 ± 3.2, U = 530.50, P = 0.0177. Modification of the approaches to preoperative preparation and postoperative management of elderly and senile patients diagnosed with senile asthenia will reduce the frequency of postoperative complications and reduce the length of hospital stay.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».