MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7035858982

Association between cardiometabolic pregnancy complications and cardiovascular diseases

2017· dissertation· en· W7035858982 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2017
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueAgricultural Systems and Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Vascular NetworkHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
Mots-clésPregnancyGestational diabetesDiseaseDiabetes mellitusEndothelial dysfunctionVascular diseaseAcute coronary syndromeNatural historyProspective cohort study
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Cardiometabolic pregnancy complications including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and gestational diabetes (GDM) each double the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life. Two hypotheses have been posited to explain this increase in risk: shared burden of atherosclerotic risk factors, and persistent vascular impairment after the affected pregnancy. Thus, the aim of this work is to explore the biological mechanism underlying the association between pregnancy complications and CVD as well as the clinical outcomes at the time of an ischemic event. Methods: 1. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we summarized and updated evidence for sustained vascular dysfunction at least three months after HDP, as measured by imaging modalities and serum biomarkers. We pooled results of modalities reported in more than three studies using a random effects model. 2. Using data from the GENESIS-PRAXY prospective cohort, we studied 251 parous women (≤ 55 years old) hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in whom detailed medical and obstetric history as well as biological data were available. We compared clinical presentation, traditional risk factors and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction at ACS diagnosis in women with versus without a prior history of complicated pregnancy (HDP and/or GDM). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were captured at 12 months.Results: 1. By summarizing more than 70 studies, we found evidence of sustained vascular dysfunction after pregnancies complicated with HDP. There was evidence of vascular dysfunction in women post HDP compared to women with prior normal pregnancy when measured by carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (0.64m/s [0.17 to 1.11]), carotid intima-media thickness (0.025mm [0.004 to 0.045]) and augmentation index (5.48% [1.58 to 9.37]), as well as mean levels of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase (6.12pg/ml [1.91 to 10.33]). Vascular dysfunction was more pronounced in younger women (< 40 years) and closer to the index pregnancy. 2. At the time of the ACS, women with previous pregnancy complications were younger (47.4 ± 6.2 vs. 49.1 ± 5.6 years, p=0.002), and had a greater burden of traditional atherosclerotic risk factors compared with women with prior normal pregnancy. Of note, women with prior preeclampsia were more likely to have chronic hypertension and to present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction as compared to women with prior unaffected pregnancy (adjusted OR 2.76 [1.04, 7.29]). At 12 months, there was a trend for increased risk of MACE in women with prior pregnancy complications, mostly driven by an increased risk of recurrent ACS in women with prior preeclampsia.Conclusion: Pooled data from studies evaluating vascular imaging suggest that some vascular dysfunction persists in women with prior HDP as compared to women with prior normal pregnancy. Women with prior pregnancy complications also present with ACS at a younger age, and with a high burden of atherosclerotic risk factors. In particular, preeclampsia was associated with more severe ACS at presentation and a higher likelihood of recurrence. Further studies are needed to understand the precise trajectory between cardiometabolic pregnancy complications and development of CVD, and the development and testing of tailored interventions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,980
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Même sujetAgricultural Systems and PracticesTravaux en français237 207