The Accelerated Access Initiative to Quality Formal Education for Syrian Refugee Children (AAI). A look back and forward. AAI Transition Workshop Report
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Since the London Conference in February 2016, the international community has supported the Government of Jordan in its response to the Syrian crisis by channelling their assistance and commitments within the framework of the Jordan Response Plan. As part of the Jordan Response Plan, the Ministry of Education launched the ‘Accelerating Access to Quality Formal Education for Syrian Refugee Children’ (AAI) whose main objective, over the last three years, has been to increase access to formal education for Syrian refugee children without lowering the quality of education for Jordanian children. The initiative has been supported by a number of international donors and has been funded through on-budget and off-budget aid modalities over the period 2016-2019, and has now been extended until 2020. Following the donor- supported AAI plan, the Ministry of Education has ensured the enrolment in formal education of approximately 134,000 Syrian refugee children between 2016 and 2019. \nTo inform the next phase of support after 2020, a research report was commissioned in May 2019. The report titled ‘The Accelerated Access Initiative to Quality Formal Education for Syrian Refugee Children (AAI). Lessons learned, challenges and the way forward’ (hereafter Main Report) aimed to assess donors’ aid modalities to the AAI, capture lessons learned regarding the period 2016-2019 and map out intentions and preferences of stakeholders for the next phase of aid programming. This included assessing impact against objectives, donor coordination structures, identifying challenges, dilemmas and complementarities in donors’ support as well as capture constraints and preferences for the next phase. The report was based on an in-depth literature review on aid modalities and semi-structured interviews with AAI donors, Ministry of Education (MoE) officials and other educational stakeholders during the period May 28 – June 20 (see Annex 4, main report). \nTo validate and triangulate the findings of the main report, as well as to bring all stakeholders around the same table, an ‘AAI Transition Workshop’ was organized at the Canadian Embassy on June 19, 2019. The present report (hereafter Workshop Report) summarises the presentations and discussions during the one-day workshop. The workshop report should be seen as an output of the main report. While it confirms the findings of the main report, it adds more nuance and complexity to some of the key challenges, commonalities and dilemmas that were identified in the main report.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle