MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7036051596

[Annual dredging and resource agency coordination meeting 2016]; USACE Northwestern Division overview

2016· other· en· W7036051596 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUS Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core) · 2016
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDredgingPort (circuit theory)CourtesyAgency (philosophy)Resource (disambiguation)Tonnage
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

US Army Corps of Engineers\nBUILDING STRONG®\nImage courtesy of Port of Vancouver USA\nImage courtesy of Port of Seattle USA\nUSACE Northwestern Division Overview\nSheryl Carrubba\nNorthwestern Division\nNavigation Program Manager\nApril 1, 2016BUILDING STRONG®\nRegional Perspective\n• Leadership Changes\n• NWD Navigation Budget\n• Project Improvements\n• Extended Lock Outage\n• Updates to the Sediment Evaluation Framework (SEF)BUILDING STRONG®\nBG Scott A Spellmon\nDeputy\nCommander\nCommander\nPrograms Director\nReg. Business\nDirector\nOmaha\nPHOTO\nDave Ponganis Jim Hearn\nCOL John\nHenderson\nPortland\nCOL Jose\nAguilar\nKansas City Seattle Walla Walla\nLTC Timothy\nVail\nCOL John\nBuck\nCOL Andrew Sexton\nCOL Torrey A DiCiro\nNWD Leadership Team\n3\nBUILDING STRONG®\nPresident’s Budgets ($millions)\nPres Bud Coastal Inland Nav CW total\nNav\nPercent\nFY 17 $1,017$917$1,934$4,62042%\nFY 16 $973 $974$1,947$4,73241%\nFY 15 $991 $834$1,825$4,56140%\nFY 14 $980 $904$1,884$4,82639%\nFY 13 $967 $780$1,747$4,73137%\nFY 12 $832 $744$1,575$4,63134%\nFY 11 $873 $779$1,652$4,93933%\nFY 10 $971 $796$1,767$5,12535%\nFY 09 $969 $931$1,900$474140%BUILDING STRONG®\nNavigation Budget by Account ($millions)\nPres Bud\nFiscal Yr InvestigationsConstruction O&M MR&T Total Nav\nFY 17 $22 $348$1,527$37$1,934\nFY 16 $25 $321$1,563$38$1,947\nFY 15 $22 $277$1,487$39$1,825\nFY 14 $23 $345$1,461$55$1,884\nFY 13 $25 $352$1,326$44$1,747\nFY 12 $18 $283$1,237$37$1,575\nFY 11 $19 $291$1,297$45$1,653\nFY 10 $19 $288$1,411$48$1,767\nFY 09 $20 $495$1,346$39$1,900BUILDING STRONG®\nCoastal Navigation Budget ($million)\nPres Bud InvestigationsConstruction O&M MR&T Total Coastal\nFY 17 $14 $105$896$2$1,017\nFY 16 $18 $81$872$2$973\nFY 15 $17 $97$875$2$991\nFY 14 $16 $108$853$2$980\nFY13$17$151$797$2$967\nFY12$7$117$706$2$832\nFY11 $9 $115$747$2$873\nFY10$16$119$834$2$971BUILDING STRONG®\nInland Navigation Budget ($million)\nPres Bud InvestigationsConstruction O&M MR&T Total Inland\nFY 17 $8 $243$631$34$917\nFY 16 $7 $240$691$36$974\nFY 15 $5 $180$612$37$834\nFY 14 $7 $237$608$53$904\nFY13$8$201$529$42$780\nFY12 $11 $166 $531$35$743\nFY11 $10 $176$550$43$779\nFY10$3$170$577$47$796BUILDING STRONG®\nNWD NAV BUDGET\n(millions)\n* Includes Missouri River Inland and Lake Washington Ship Canal\nCATEGORY FY15\nBUDGET\nFY15\nAPPROP FY16\nBUDGET\nFY16\nAPPROP FY17\nBUDGET\nHigh\nTonnage $ 75,201 $ 77,801 $ 70,022 $ 87,539 $ 80,401\n(O&M only) $ 74,001 $ 74,001 $ 58,522 $ 67,039 $ 58,001\nMed Tonnage $ 71,832 $ 78,755 $ 87,421 $105,424 $ 72,379\nLow Tonnage* $ 15,655 $ 22,550 $ 12,648 $ 28,338 $ 18,085\nTotal O&M $161,488 $175,306 $158,591 $200,801 $148,465\n% LT/Total Nav\nO&M 10% 13%8%14%12%\nRegional TopicsBUILDING STRONG®\nNWD BUDGET VS APPROPRIATIONS\nRegional TopicsBUILDING STRONG®\nRegional Topics\nExtended Lock Outage\nDecember 2016 – March 2017\nDetailed Update: 1 June 2016 at SAGE Center; Boardman, ORBUILDING STRONG®\nNavigation Locks on the CSRS\nMCR\nJetties\nCR Deep Draft\n11\nExtended Outage Sites\nD/S gudgeon anchors,\nU/S gate, controls\nControls upgrade\nRoutine Maintenance\nD/S gate mechanical equipment upgrades\nD/S miter gate\nstructural repair\nRoutine Maintenance\nMajor work\nRoutine Maintenance\nAdded Work\n```````````````````\nRegional TopicsBUILDING STRONG®\nSeattle Harbor Improvement\nSEATTLE HARBOR\nFeasibility Study\nRegional TopicsBUILDING STRONG®\nGrays Harbor DeepeningBUILDING STRONG®\nCoos Bay Deepening Study\n(Sec 204 & Sec 408 Study)BUILDING STRONG®\nSediment Evaluation Frame Work\n2016 UpdateBUILDING STRONG®\nWhat’s New in 2016 SEF Update?\n Revisions based on Local Experience since 2009 - What’s working what’s confusing\n Clarity – Streamlined, reorganized and shorter\n Edits for Language Consistency; Concept Consistency\n Inclusion of Science Advances: Freshwater Screening\nLevels and other Publicly Coordinated Changes\n Revised Change ProcessBUILDING STRONG®\nAreas RSET Continues to Work on\n Freshwaterstandards – Fish Tissue sampling\n Bioaccumulation (Chapter8)BUILDING STRONG®\nSediment Evaluation Frame Work\nhttp://www.nwd.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Navigation/RSET.aspx\nComment Period 19 November 2015 – 1 February 2016\nNew RSET mailing list: email Sheryl.A.Carrubba@usace.army.mil\nOr\nSign-Up Sheet on the Back TableBUILDING STRONG®\nMissouri River Navigators\nMissouri River NavMeeting – 10 February 2016\nFirst visit on the Missouri River March 2016\nBrunswick, MO – RM 256BUILDING STRONG®\nQuestions?\nSheryl.A.Carrubba@usace.army.mil\nUSACE Northwestern DivisionUS Army Corps of Engineers\nBUILDING STRONG®\nPortland District -“USACE 101”\nKevin J. Brice, P.E., PMP\nDeputy District Engineer\nPortland District\nApril 1, 2016BUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n2\n“USACE 101” -Agenda\nCorps of Engineers / Portland District\nCivil Works Missions\nAuthorization and Appropriation\nCorps’ Appropriations\n/ Portland District Navigation AppropriationsBUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n3\nU.S. Army Corps of Engineers\nMajor Mission Areas:\n►Civil Works\n►Military Programs\n►Environmental (HTRW) Programs\n►Interagency and International Support (IIS)BUILDING STRONGPORTLAND DISTRICT ® 4\nIrrigation / Water Supply Regulatory\nEmergency\nResponse\nHydropower Navigation\nEnvironmental Protection\n& Restoration\nFlood Damage\nRecreation Reduction\nCivil Works\nMissions\nBUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n5\nHydropower\n•BPA-Direct Funded\n•12 Power Plants\n•Generate more electricity than any other Corps District -3 million homes\n•Operate 3 of 5 largest plants in the Corps of EngineersBUILDING STRONGPORTLAND DISTRICT ® 6\nColumbia River Fish\nMitigation (CRFM) - C\nBUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n7Bonneville Dam OutfallsCougar Dam temperature control towerJohn Day SmoltMonitoring FacilityB2 Corner CollectorFish Mitigation & EnhancementBUILDING STRONGPORTLAND DISTRICT ® 8\nRecreation\nPortland District projects alone\nhosted more than 13 million\nvisitors last year\nBUILDING STRONGPORTLAND DISTRICT ® 9\n• District projects have prevented $20 billion in\ndamages to public and private property\n• Willamette & Columbia projects store about\n25% of runoff\n• 365 miles of levees and bank protection\nprojects\n• 15 flood control dams\nFlood Damage\nReduction\nBUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n10Mount St. Helens, May 18, 1980 Flood of 1996Alaska Emergency Dredging, 1999\nPreparing for the Future:\n-CascadiaEarthquake?\n-Debris Planning & Response Team (PRT) for National Deployment\n-State, Regional, National Level ExercisesEmergency ResponseExxon Valdez Oil Spill, 1989BUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n11\n•Administers Corps Regulatory Program in State of Oregon and Washington Ports on Columbia River\n•Section 10 of Rivers and Harbors Act\n•Section 404 of Clean Water Act\n•Approximately 3000 actions per yearRegulatoryUS Army Corps of Engineers\nBUILDING STRONG®\nNavigation\n10 Deep Draft Harbors\n12 Shallow Draft Harbors\n12 Large Scale Jetty Structures\n224 Miles of Maintained Waterways\n50.5 Million Tons in Annual Commerce\n3 High-Lift Navigation Locks\n6 VesselsBUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n13\nEssayons\nYaquina\nDredging Assets\n•ESSAYONSand YAQUINA (Half of Corps’ minimum hopper dredge fleet)\n•Port of Portland’s Dredge OREGON\n•West Coast Hopper Dredge Contract –FY15 Manson Construction (Dredge Bayport)\n•Clamshell Dredge Contracts\nOregon -PoP\nBayport –Manson ConstructionBUILDING STRONGPORTLAND DISTRICT ® 14\nPacific\nOcean\nBaker Bay\nNorth Jetty\nSouth Jetty\nClatsop Spit\nPeacock\nSpit\nWashington\nOregon\nSand Island\nIlwaco\nAstoria\nHammond\nChinook\nJetty “A”\nSand Island Pile Dikes\nLong Beach\nNorth Head\nColumbia River\nEstuary\nMCR Navigation\nLower Columbia River Nav Channel\nN\nChannel\n®\n®\nMouth of the Columbia Jetty\nRehabilitation\nBUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n15\n•Mouth of the Columbia River (MCR) Jetties-Major Rehab Report (C)\nNorth Jetty\n2 miles long , 1914-1917\nPeacock Spit\nPacific Ocean\nColumbia River Estuary\nClatsop Spit\nSouth Jetty6 miles long 1885-1913\nJetty A\n1.6 miles long, 1938-39\nSand Island pile dikes 1930-1935\n®\n®BUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n16\nMCR North Jetty –Critical Repairs\n•Redirects overland flow away from the jetty structure\n•Places gravel, stone, and dredged sand on the landward side of the jetty to eliminate the tidal flow through the jetty\n•Goal is to stabalizeNorth Jetty Root and its foundation\nOct. 2012\nStabilization Areas\n®\n®BUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n17\nPortland District Navigation Support Mission\nPortland District provides dredging support to other Corps of Engineers’ Divisions and Districts with our Federal Dredge Fleet and West Coast Hopper Dredge ContractBUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n18\nPlanning and ExecutionBUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n19\nU.S. Army Corps of Engineers\nMajor Mission Areas:\n►Civil Works\n►Military Programs\n►Environmental (HTRW) Programs\n►Interagency and International Support (IIS)BUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n20\nLEGEND:\nDivision HQ location\nDivision boundary\nDistrict boundary\nState boundary\nSeattle Dist\nPortland Dist\nWalla Walla Dist\nOmaha Dist\nKansas City Dist\nSan Francisco Dist\nSacramento Dist\nAlaska Dist\nLos Angeles Dist\nAlbuquerque Dist\nU.S. Army Corps of Engineers\n-Division Structure (Civil Works)\nPacific\nOcean\nSouth\nAtlantic\nMississippi\nValley\nNorth\nAtlantic\nGreat Lakes and\nOhio River\nSouthwestern\nSouth Pacific\nNorthwestern\nGulf Region BUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n21BUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n22\nCorps Projects & Funding\nAuthorization\nand\nAppropriationBUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n23BUILDING STRONG®\nPORTLAND DISTRICT\n24\nAppropriations in NWP(Energy and Water Appropriations)\nInvestigations (I)\nConstruction (C)\nOperations and Maintenance (O&M)\n►Regulatory Program\nOther: Non-Appropriations –BPA DirectBUILDI

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,611
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUS Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core)Même sujetMathematics, Computing, and Information ProcessingTravaux en français237 207