Assessment on the use of FTA-stored DNA method for detection of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) P12 and P15 from Elaeis guineensis / Zainab Aliyu Muhammad
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) card is a model tool set employed to serve as an alternative way to preserve the sample and simplifies the steps for the DNA samples collection, transportation and purification. The delivery and storage of oil palm fresh tissue require a lower temperature to avoid DNA degradation. Hence, sample collection and preservation become challenging especially to less equipped laboratories. The main objective of this study was to assess the quantity and quality of isolated DNA from FTA-Stored of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) leaves tissues for detection of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) P12 and P15 which are DNA markers for dura (D), pisifera (P) and tenera (T) classification. Samples were collected from young oil palm tree via cutting the leaves with harvesting stick and taken to the laboratory. DNA was extracted from fresh samples and FTA-Stored samples using DNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen USA, coded as Kit D) and EZ.NA Spin Column (Bio Basic Inc. Canada, coded as kit E) respectively. The concentration and purity of the isolated DNA was determined using Scandrop2u. The detection of P12 and P15 DNA markers using PCR-RAPD was carried out using three types of samples, (i) DNA from fresh leaves samples, (ii) DNA from FTA-Stored samples and (iii) Direct FTA-Stored samples. Two primer set were used in the PCR-RAPD: (i) Primer P15 (5'- TTGGCACGGG -3’) and (ii) P12 (5'-TCTGGTGAGG-3') with an expected amplicon size of 700 bp, 800 bp 1000 bp and 600 bp, 750 bp, 1100 bp respectively. The amplification and presence of P12 and P15 DNA markers in the DNA of fresh leaves samples, DNA from FTA-Stored samples and direct FTA-Stored samples were determined using agarose gel electrophoresis. The statistical analysis T-Test was carried out to test for significance difference. The quantity of DNA extracted from fresh samples from both kits gave a concentration range of 20 ± 2.60 ̶ 233 ± 60.50 μg/μl with a purity range of 0.90 ± 0.10 ̶ 2.07 ± 0.20. The DNA FTA-Stored samples extracted from both kits also gave a concentration range of 34.5 ± 4.90 ̶ 233.31 ± 105.80 μg/μl with a purity range of 0.95 ± 0.20 - 1.80 ± 0.11. The t-test result indicates that there is no significant difference between fresh samples and FTA-Stored samples. PCR products obtained from the fresh samples extracted from kit D using RAPDP15 indicates that 2 samples out of 3 gave band of 800 bp , 600 bp and 450 bp while kit E did not show bands, RAPDP12 showed band for only one sample extracted from kit D with size of 1100 bp, 750 bp and 500 bp and kit E give two bands out of 3 with size of 750 bp and 600 bp. FTA-Stored samples amplified with RRAPD P15 using kit D give 2 bands out of 3 with a sizes of 1100 bp, 800 bp and 700 bp and kit E show band for all three samples with size of 800 bp and 500 bp, RAPDP12 Kit D showed a single band of 1100 bp, 750 bp and 600 bp while kit E didn’t show the band. The result from direct PCR indicates that 2 samples amplified using RAPD P15 only give a band of 1100 bp, 700 bp and 500 bp while none of the samples amplified using RAPD P12 showed a band. The result indicates that FTA-Stored samples have the highest concentration and purity range compared to fresh samples. Based on agarose gel electrophoresis photo, the bands from PCR amplicons of FTA-Stored samples were more distinct than fresh samples. The present research work explains suitability of using FTA cards for DNA storage.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».