MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7036283238

The baglady-storying provocation

2023· article· en· W7036283238 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueEdge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Établissements canadiensEducation and Early Childhood Development
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStorytellingPraxisCollegialityFlourishingStatus quoQualitative researchScholarshipCognitive reframingAffect (linguistics)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The seeds and germs of stories are all around and you will fall over them every day’ (Ovington et al., Forthcoming).The aim of this Game Changer is to put to work storyingas a vessel to make kin, rhizomatically connecting others through the intimacy of sharing and (re)making knowledge(s) together. This event will bring researchers together from across disciplines and interests, nurturing connections, and spaces anew to cutacross communities of researchers and inquirists. By creating stories together that will collide, disperse, cross-pollinate, and compost with thingly-power (Bennett, 2010) in/with/through our emergent #baglady~narrative~methodology of affirmative praxis (Ovington et al., Forthcoming) to initiate collegiality and further develop how researchers can work~together and apart to disrupt dominant qualitative research practice. In this Gamechanger event, participants will collectively engage in arts-based storytelling inspired by Haraway (2016) around the topic of making Higher Education more accessible, with the aim of thinking differently about how to engage with diversity, and challenging the existing Widening Participation agenda.Working~with affect (Strom and Mills, 2021) we challenge the status quo of feeding the marketised and metricised academic machine and its regime of performativity, we have coined as ‘academic churn’. This churn privileges knowledge-making as a solo endeavour. We disrupt this by enacting an inclusive, capacious, and generative approach to knowledge-making practices, where we (re)imagine the impact and focus of our qualitative inquiries, to reveal other becoming~collective kin-ships ethically (Albin-Clark et al., 2021).Narrative research-creation provokes new inquiries, experimentations, and flourishing (Manning and Massumi, 2016) and this storytelling Gamechanger poses the following questions of ‘knowledge-ing’ (Taylor, 2021, p. 30):•How can we affirm practices where we can operate as individuals with/in/through the academy and nurture resistance and feminist activism through collegial confederations?•How can we imagine diversity and welcome difference within the Academy, as an alternative to the narrow approaches implemented under the existing Widening Participation agenda•How are we moved to act with kinship~ing as a #baglady praxis to create new spaces of belonging within the Academy and wider society?•What complexities are entangled in widening #baglady research-creation to move beyond ‘clique-y-ness’ into inclusive practices?Allow us to introduce the #baglady collective...The physically restrictive conditions brought about by the Covid pandemic couched writing and knowledge-making practices as daunting events for the yet to be revealedbecoming~collective of four early career researchers.As the knowledge-making practices they had relied on were brought to a halt, they were inspired by disruptive ways of doing qualitative research,considering ways in which they could ‘produce different knowledge and produce knowledge differently’ (St. Pierre, 1997, p. 175). Coming together and supporting each other through kin-ship in troubled times (Braidotti, 2019). The original collective of four has grown and now spans the globe, with new cluster~collectives that have flourished in spaces anew storying together, and apart.The becoming~collective praxis firmly rooted itself in Le Guin’s ‘Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction’ (2019; 1989), and Haraway’s notion of ‘kin-shipping’ (Latto, et al., Forthcoming). As Le Guin (1989) explains, stories are bags, or receptacles, used to collectively gather food to share and nourish others. The ‘food’ for us is feminist materialist and posthuman theories that nourish us to challenge knowledgemaking practices as a feminist endeavour in the Anthropocene. We feel a growing urgency to find ways to research and (co)create ethically response-able practices and alternative knowledges. At its heart, the #baglady~narrative~methodology praxis is a generative and hopeful pedagogical move. We kin-ship. In this propagator, we experiment with practical and creative sessions that invite participants to be inspired by storytelling to (re)make them as an embodied material-discursive activity (Fairchild et al., 2022). Consequently, participants will be asked to bring an object that fits in their bag, then share an object~story to inspire (new)stories about what it means to belong in the Academy and wider ECQI2023: Face to Face AbstractsUniversity of Portsmouth | 11of 130society, and what role does the Academy have in creating spaces of belonging, throughcreative experimentation and collaborative inquiry

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,030
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,101

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,008
Communication savante0,0090,007
Science ouverte0,0030,014
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0300,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEdge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University)Même sujetSleep and Work-Related FatigueTravaux en français237 207