Caring for someone with depression: attitudes and clinical practices of Australian mental health clinicians
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Family members and carers who support a person with depression are faced with specific challenges and are often significantly burdened as a result of the role. Those caring for someone with depression report being dissatisfied with the level of inclusivity and support provided by clinicians. However, little is known about what influences the support provided to Australian carers of people in depression. Method: To investigate this, 119 Australian mental health clinicians were surveyed with a self-report questionnaire to gather information on their attitudes towards, and current clinical practices when, working with family members and carers of a person with depression. Participants comprised mental health clinicians who identified their primary client group as mental health consumers or family members and carers. Recruitment occurred via invitation to clinicians who had attended a Partners in Depression facilitator training course and recruitment of clinicians who had not attended this training. Results: Results indicated that the attitudes of clinicians towards family members and carers were generally positive, while inclusive clinical practices varied. Providing family members and carers with an orientation to services and information on how to respond in crisis situations were two of the most frequently reported interventions. There were a number of barriers to inclusive practice identified, which were predominantly organisational in nature. In addition, those who perceived more barriers reported providing more clinical interventions to family members and carers of people with depression. In contrast, there was no relationship between reported attitudes and perceived barriers. Additionally, attitudes and barriers did not predict the inclusive clinical practice of those working directly with carers, while there was a significant relationship between perceived barriers and the inclusive clinical practice for those working directly with family members and carers. Conclusions: It appears that in order for inclusive practice to occur more consistently there is a need for major organisational and systematic reform. Further research is necessary to explore the reasons why family members and carers are not routinely included in the care and treatment process for people with depression.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».