Arctic Coastal Dynamics : Report of the 3rd International Workshop, University of Oslo (Norway), 2-5 December 2002
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Arctic Coastal Dynamics (ACD) is a joint project of the International Arctic Sciences Committee (IASC) and the International Pennafrost Association.Its overall objective is to improve our understanding of circum-Arctic coastal dynamics as a function of environmental forcing, coastal geology and cryology and mosphodynamic behavior.The third IASC-sponsored ACD workshop was held in Oslo, Norway, on December 2-5, 2002.Pasticipants from Canada (3), Germany (3), Great Bsitain (1), the Netherlands (1), Norway (6), Russia (1 l), Switzerland (1) and the United States (2) attended.The objective of the workshop was to review the Status of ACD according to the Science and Implementation Plan, with the main focus on the quantitative assessment of the sediment and organic carbon input to the Arctic Ocean through coastal erosion.Dusing the first past of the workshop, 29 Papers dealing with regional andlor circum-Arctic coastal dynamics were presented.Based on the material presented, three regional working groups and two circum-Arctic working groups were organized.The main task of the regional working groups was to continue previous efforts to Segment and classify the coast for their sectors.The coastal segmentation and classification is the basis for the assessment of the sediment and organic carbon input through coastal erosion.The circum-Arctic working groups focused On GIS development and extraction and presentation of environmental data, respectively.Finally, the results of the workshop and the next steps were discussed in the ACD Steering Committee meeting.The present report summarizes the program of the Arctic Coastal Dvnainics -Report of the 3"' International Workshop * produce a series of thematic and derived maps (e.g.coastal classification, ground-ice, sensitivity etc.);The project elements were formulated at a workshop in Woods Hole in November 1999 cassied out under the auspices of the International Pesmafrost Association (IPA), its working group on Coastal and Offshore Permafrost and its Coastal Erosion subgroup (Brown and Solomon 2000).As a result of the workshop a metadata form for the selection and establishment of key monitoring sites was developed.A consistent and generalized coastal classification scheme was established based on morphology and matesials.Consensus was reached On direct and indirect methodologies for estimating ground-ice volumes and presentations of data on maps.Finally, a suite of standard tools and techniques for development of long-term coastal monitosing sites was recommended.Dunng the Arctic Science Summit Week in April 2000 in Cambridge, UK, and at the request of the P A , the Council of the International Arctic Science Committee (IASC) approved funding for a follow up workshop to develop a Science and Implementation Plan for ACD.The resulting international workshop, held in Potsdam (Gesmany) on 18-20 October 2000, produced a phased, five-year Science and Implementation Plan (Figure 2).The pasticipants selected Volker Rachold to be the official IASC Project Leader.Hans Hubbesten, Head of the AWI Potsdam Depastment, agreed to establish an ACD project office at AWI-Potsdam with a secretasiat headed by Volker Rachold to maintain international communications including the web site (http://www.awi-potsdam.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».