MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7036569608

Contribution to the development of spinal functional magnetic resonance imaging as a tool in the investigation of spinal cord physiology

2006· dissertation· en· W7036569608 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2006
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueSustainability and Innovation in Business
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research Chairs
Mots-clésSagittal planeSpinal cordFunctional magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance imagingLumbarAnkle
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It is important, in order to further establish spinal fMRI as a valuable clinical and research tool, to expand the repeoire of stimuli and responses that can be assessed by this method.The specific contributions to the development ofspinal functional magnetic resonance imaging were carried out in four studies.The first study aimed to develop a Iower limb movement task suitable for functional imaging.A pedal was designed, built and tested, and healthy human volunteers paicipated in alterrating flexion and extension ankle movements during a single-shot fast spin-echo imaging sequence.Active and passive pedaling was performed by all volunteers.Images werc found to be sufficiently unaffected by motion.Neuronal activity was detected in the dosal and ventral homs bilaterally in both conditions, however there was less activity overall in response to passive pedaling.Active and passive pedaling each incuned signal changes of General IntroductionAlthough MRI has been used to anatomically image the spinal cord fo a number of years, it has only recently been successful in investigating functional processes.The purpose of this dissetation is to contribute to the development of spinal fMRI as a tool for investigating spinal cord physiology.In order to reach this goal, a number of studies were conducted.First, a spinal fMRI study was carried out that involved healthy volunteels imaged while participating in lower limb movement tasks.Second, we have adjusted the method to obtain images in the sagittal orientation.The numerous difficulties with developing this technique ale outlined in the introduction.Third, once imaging in the sagittal orientation was established in the cervical cord, we used the technique to image the lumbar cord of spinal cord injuled volunteers employing the same tasks used with the healthy volunteers, both to further validate the sagittal imaging method and also to see if spinal fMRI could detect neuronal function caudal to an injury site.Fourth, a paper considering the implications of a cluster analysis of this data ends the manuscript component of this work.In or der to appreciate the unique contribution this project brings to the literature, a review of the MR basics and fMRI studies that lead up to this body of work are outlined, and the relevant spinal cord physiology is provided to assist in the comprehension ofthe imaging results.The four manuscripts are then included in the dissertation to describe the rationale, methods, results and discussion of the above mentioned studies.Finally, an overall discussion concludes the dissertation.present, the orientation of a magnetic moment is random due to its thermal motion.A magnetic moment in a static magnetic field can be in only one of two possible states, either aligned parallel to the fietd or against it (anti-parallel).Each state has a specific energy.When placed in the magnst, after a few seconds the magnetic moments achieve equilibrium where they either align parallel with the static magnetic field or anti-parallel to it.Since the energy of the parallel state is the lower of the two, more magnetic moments are in this state, according to MR convention.It is the net magnetization of the sample, the difference between the number of parallel and anti-parallel magnetic moments, that is observed.The "magnetization" is the net magnetic moment per unit volume.The magnetic field is the static field of the MR system and is called Bs (with the z axis being defined as parallel to Bo).The magnetization depends on the magnetic field strength and the temperature.Increasing B increases the number of protons that align parallel to Bo, as opposed to anti-parallel.Increasing temperature incr.eases the random forces that tend to push the magnetic moments out of alignment into a more t.andomorjentation.The equilibrium magnetization, M6, is the net total magnetic field of the magnetic moments.This magnetization is aligned parallel to the Bo field, is parallel to the z axis, and is zero in the transverse (xy) plane.When the magnetization is in the equilibrium state, it does not produce a detectable MR signal.In order for a signal to be detected, the magnetization must first be disturbed from equilibrium.The energy needed to cause an energy transition or a change of the magnetic moments from being parallel to the field to anti-parallel is at the same frequency as the precession of the magnetic moments in that field.This is called the resonance condition.Protons precess at a resonance frequency that is proportional to B, and this is defined by the Larmor Equation: to6=yBe where omega (o0) is the resonance frequency and gamma (y) is a gyromagnetic constant.Each type of nucleus has a specific spin and gyromagnetic ratio.By applying an oscillating magnetic field that stays in phase with the rotation of the magnetic moments and keeps pushing them in the same direction, this field is then also at the right energy to give energy to the magnetic moments.As a result, we can use a low intensity magnetic field, given that it is at the right frequency, to have a strong influence on the magnetization.At the equilibrium state, the magnetization is parallel to Be and does not move.To get it to move away from Be, a weak magnetic moment which is oscillating at the Larmor frequency is used.The Larmor frequency is in the radio frequency range, which is apploximately 64lMI{z at 1.5 Tesla.This magnetic field that is used to tip it away, 81, needs to be at a 90 degree angle to Bo.If it were parallel, it would only add to the field, but at a right angle it is able to cause the magnetization to precess out of alignment with Bo.The magnetization is precessing around the net field, and so by changing the direction of the field that we add at the same speed as the magnetization, this effect accumulates.The magnetization rotates away from the alignment with 86.With a bdef pulse of the B1 field it is possible to rotate the magnetization completely into the transverse (xy) plane.This brief pulse is called the radio-frequency (RF) pulse.The absorption of RF waves, which causes the spins to change their orientation from parallel to anti-parallel, is refened to as perturbation.With the application of an RF wave, M spirals down towards the transverse plane.\Vhen the RF is turned off, three simultaneous effects occur.One, the absorbed RF energy dissipates away into thermal energy as the magnetic moments relax back to equilibrium.The signal we detect is from the magnetic moments rotating in phase, to ploduce a time-varying magnetization that induces an electric cunent in an MR coil.Two, the excited spins begin to retum to odginal orientation (T1 relaxation).And thee, the initially in-phase excited protons begin to dephase (T2 and T2* relaxation).Relaxation times are physical properties of the water environment (in terms of biological tissues).Relaxation refers to the retum of the spins to a stable low energy or random state after they have been excited or altered.Relaxation implies, therefore, that the spin system is retuming to a state of equilibrium.Further explanation of these concepts can be found in Bitar et al. (2006).There are a number of soutces of field variation over which the experimenter has no control.There is, however, a field variation intentionally produced by applying gradients.Gradients are produced by coils of wire situated in the magnet that can be tumed on and off.They are meant to produce a magnetic field that is parallel to Bo but vary linearly in magnitude along one of the axes.At the center of the magnet and at the center of the coil the magnetic field produced is zero.Moving along the axis, the field magnitude changes.Gradients can be produced in any direction by applying gradients in two or three directions at a time.With the gradients applied and an RF pulse applied on a particular frequency, it is possible to produce an effect on a selected region of space.This means that in one position in the field, the magnetic moments are precessing at whatever particular frequency the RF pulse is applied.On either side of this position rhe precessing frequency is different enough to no longer have an effect.If a gradient is applied in the y direction, moving away from the zeo center of the magnet toward the spot where the moments are precessing at the appropriate frequency (that of the RF pulse) creates an effect in a particular location.The bandwidth of the RF pulse will determine what range of frequencies will be affected.This is what enables slice selection.After the RF pulse has been applied, the moments have otated away from the z axis to the transverse plane.However, because of the gradient along the axis these moments are all precessing at different rates, slower on one side of the slice and gradually faster on the other side of the slice.No signal can be obtained because all the different orientations cause the magnetization to sum to a net field of zero.For that reason, a slice refocusing gradient is applied in the opposite dilection which puts all the moments back into phase but in the transverse plane.Once the RF pulse is removed, if the moments are all in phase, they produce a strong signal.If they are not precessing at the same frequency, they will in time become out of phase and the signal will decrease.The location of the moments is determined by applying a linear magnetic field gradient.This g.adient identifies the location of the signal in space based on its frequency.The signal detected is the sum of all the signals; thelefore if it is known how much signal is at each frequency then it can be known how much signal is coming from each position in space.The signal that is obtained is a spatially encoded signal.This is detected wirh a gradient on and is the inverse Fourier Transform of the signal distribution along the gradient direction.This signal is recorded along a one dimensional space, along the transverse magnetization distributed along the x axis.It is called frequen

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,419
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,982

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMspace (University of Manitoba)Même sujetSustainability and Innovation in BusinessTravaux en français237 207