Compound flooding analysis over the Canadian coastal regions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The communities settling in the Canadian coastal regions are threatened by multiple flood-generating mechanisms including riverine, pluvial, and sea level forces. Reliable design flood estimation and risk assessment in these regions demand characterization of the interrelationships between different drivers as well as the corresponding compounding effects. In this study, as our first step, we assess the compound flood risks across Canada’s coasts considering eight bivariate flooding scenarios acquired from four flooding drivers including total water level, streamflow, precipitation and the skew surge at 41 sites located at three main regions of the Pacific, the Great Lakes (GL) and the Atlantic. For each scenario, an initial dependence test based on Kendall’s Tau is conducted. Their joint probability is constructed using copulas. Further, compound flood risks and the failure probabilities are analyzed considering the OR, AND, Kendall, and conditional hazard scenarios. Results suggest that most locations can be affected by compound flooding associated with at least two types of bivariate events.\nIn the second step, we characterize the dependence structure between the three drivers of total water level, streamflow and precipitation based on the C-vine copula statistical approach and create their multivariate joint distribution for different locations. This is followed by calculating the OR, AND, and Kendall compound flooding joint return periods (JRPs) and their corresponding failure probabilities (FPs) and comparing them with the univariate and independent JRP values. Further, the CHR index is applied to quantify possible under- or overestimations of the flooding risks when individual drivers are assessed, independently. The results show that multivariate JRPs are less than those of univariate and independent multivariate hazard estimates.\nIn our third objective, we try to explore the univariate and multivariate trends of four flooding drivers at all sites. The univariate Mann Kendall trend test and its extension to the multivariate case namely the Covariance Inversion Test, Covariance Sum Test, and Covariance Eigenvalue Tests are applied to see the univariate (change in the intensity and frequency) and joint nonstationary behavior of the three drivers, respectively. The results show increased risks of individual and compound flooding over the Atlantic coast, and various trends in the Pacific and the GL regions.\nFinally, we assess the compound flooding hazard under a nonstationary framework for all the locations. To this end, the time-varying behavior of the three drivers of step 2 and also the interdependencies between them are captured using linear and polynomial models. This process leads to producing a time-dependent joint occurrence/probability of the drivers. Then, the temporal variations of the compound flood hazard are assessed concerning the OR, and AND hazard scenarios and the CHR index. The results highlight the decline and increase in the AND JRPs and CHR values over time at 23 locations, especially in the Atlantic region.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».