MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7037349844

Ekspresionizam u beogradskoj arhitekturi (1918-1941)

2021· article· en· W7037349844 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueFaculty of Philosophy (University of Belgrade) · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArchitectureQuarter (Canadian coin)MultitudeSerbianHistory of architectureLandmarkArchitectural designPeriod (music)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A multitude of inspired but mostly unexecuted designs in the first quarter of the 20th century helped shape expressionism into a recognizable movement in European architecture. Viewed critically from a historical distance, it emerges as an amalgamation of inconsistent programmes and short-lived phases in the work of fantasy-prone architects, emotionally responding to considerable contradictions of a turbulent age. Apart from Germany, the Netherlands and Austria, where it produced the best architectural outcomes, it also developed in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Switzerland, Italy, Turkey, and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (Yugoslavia from 1929). For a long time considered retrograde because of its exponents’ wild subjectivism, expressionism has over the last few decades been looked upon more objectively and on an equal footing with more consistent architectural pursuits. Expressionism in Serbia, adopted from central Europe spontaneously and without much theoretical preparation (slightly later than in Croatia and Slovenia), was primarily recognizable in exterior compositional emphases, much less in spatial structures of some complexity. Expressionist ideas found their way into Serbia circuitously, through emulating examples from international architectural periodicals, rather than through analyzing central-European landmark examples in situ. Moreover, unlike their Croatian contemporaries, Serbian architects maintained no personal or professional contact with the authoritative leading figures of central-European expressionism, which is why the latter’s methods were not productively elaborated in their architectural practice. Without being thematized in the architectural curriculum or in architectural criticism, expressionism amounted to an idiom amenable to being adapted to the local situation. Yet, the merit of some expressionism-inspired works and their concurrence with color-based expressionism in Serbian painting and similar trends in avant-garde literature and music shows that the style found its embodiment, to no small extent, on the Serbian cultural scene. The Serbian architects opting for creative interpretation of contemporary styles and their adaptation to the local taste (which treated almost every new building as unique and prestigious), and carried by powerful emotions, founded two varieties of national expressionism. Avoiding the ‘pure’ monostylistic architectural language in favor of a syncretistic multilayered one, romanticists accepted it wholeheartedly as a means for stressing the outline of imaginative compositions, combining it with post-secessionist and national-style patterns, while modernists used it fruitfully for accentuating angles and plastically breaking up their sprawling structures. In most executed and unexecuted designs, for the most part created in Belgrade, Niš and Novi Sad (to an extent also in Leskovac and Šabac), expressionism is primarily observable in form, less in the organization of space, interior design and construction. Even though it only rarely manifested itself in a pure or complete form, it did, along with Czech cubism, central-European functionalism, and French purism and art deco, play a significant part in the linguistic crystallization of Serbian modernism. It may also be observed in pre-modernist phases in the work of the founders of Serbian modernism, Present in a more or less developed form in interwar Belgrade architecture, expressionism was obviously retreating before the rush of eclectic late-modernist and monumentalist academic concepts in the last pre-war years. It was not revived until several decades later, by the creative wing of the Belgrade school of modern architecture, and in the work of today’s neo-modernists. The overview of the most important works of interwar Belgrade expressionism has shown a diversity of ways in which its repertoire was used. The movement’s innovative style and seductive symbolism had an appeal to leading and less prominent architects alike, whose work remains insufficiently studied. Hence the meticulous recording of as yet unexplored examples emerges as an important objective of historical studies in the future.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,029

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,004
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFaculty of Philosophy (University of Belgrade)Même sujetMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchTravaux en français237 207