Escrita acadêmica nas áreas da linguística e enfermagem: um estudo dos relatórios finais de iniciação científica
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Given the current scarcity of researches that analyze the Institution of Scientific Initiation Scholarships - PIBIC Research Report, from the perspective of Sociodiscursive Interactionism - ISD and the influence of Disciplinary Culture, we consider it necessary to investigate the sections Abstracts and Introductions of the Final Scientific Initiation Reports (RFIC) reports of PIBIC / UFPB grantees, areas of Linguistics and Nursing from the point of view of its textual-discursive materiality and its connections with the culture of each area. In order to reach the proposed objective, we chose as the category of analysis the production parameters, the infrastructure (general plan and types of speeches) and the influence of the disciplinary culture in the construction of the texts. Thus, for the development of this qualitative research of an interpretative nature and exploratory objectives, which uses a documentary corpus, we have the collaboration of the Coordination of the RFIC (PROPESQ / UFPB), which provided archives, containing final reports of scientific research. Of these, we selected 20 reports, 10 from the Nursing area and 10 from the Linguistics area. To support the analysis, we rely on the theoretical-methodological perspective of the ISD, which bases its theoretical contribution on two axes: human development and the social of the formative activities (BRONCKART, 1999, 2006, 2009), with a special focus on text infrastructure and in the discursive worlds. In this paper, we present the results of the literature on the literature of the literature (LeChuan, 2007), Leurão (2007), when discussing the importance of academic genres in the training of students. Hyland (2000), Navarro (2014) and Costa (2012), who discuss the concept of disciplinary culture and the influence on the various written productions, Pires (2015), Massi and Queiroz (2015) that discuss Scientific Initiation and PIBIC. The discussion carried out throughout the work, from the point of view of infrastructure, points out reports with some singularities, however, most of them include all the items requested by the Program to prepare a research report. In general, in the analyzed sections of the RFIC, both in Nursing and in Linguistics, the predominance of the type of theoretical speeches with the fitting of the interactive report prevails (world of exposing and narrating) prevails. Even though it is a single genre and with the same purpose, the disciplinary culture permeates the writing of these agents, evidenced by the thematic content, use of specific terminologies in the area and structural norms of the productions. In Nursing, the agents follow a stricter orientation, as much as the rules established by PROPESQ, as to the rules of the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT) and Vancouver Standards. Linguistics, on the other hand, showed themselves to be under the influence of reports proposed by ABNT and did not strictly follow the model suggested by the program. Thus, the cultures of these two disciplines differ socially and cognitively, with contrasts not only in their objects of knowledge, but in the structures of argument, objectives and social behaviors.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».