MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7037751149

Factors Influencing the Perception and Management of Chronic Pain for Immigrant Women in Saskatchewan: An Exploratory Qualitative Study

2023· dissertation· en· W7037751149 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChronic painQualitative researchImmigrationExploratory researchThematic analysisNonprobability samplingPerception
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Chronic pain is a complex concept affected by biological, physiological, psychological, environmental, and social factors. Research has found that immigrant women are a vulnerable group because they are likely to experience higher pain intensity than non-immigrants and immigrant men due to gender roles. However, there is little qualitative research about how immigrant women perceive and manage chronic pain and the factors that aggravate their pain. An understanding of how immigrant women experience and manage their chronic pain is, therefore, important for improving healthcare outcomes for this patient group. \nPurpose: The study aims to explore immigrant women's experiences with chronic pain in Saskatchewan, Canada. The following objectives guiding the study are to 1) describe the perception of chronic pain among immigrant women in Saskatchewan’s context, 2) identify factors that aggravate the immigrant women’s experiences of chronic pain, and 3) explore the overall management of chronic pain among immigrant women in Saskatchewan’s context.\nMethodology: Exploratory qualitative study design was used to explore the factors influencing the perception and management of chronic pain among immigrant women in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 15 participants recruited using a purposive theoretical sampling strategy. The research followed the six phases of thematic analysis. \nFindings: A total of 15 participants from China, Egypt, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nigeria were interviewed in this study. All but one experienced chronic pain before immigrating to Canada. More than half of the participants reported chronic pain in multiple areas of their bodies. The study yielded three major themes: 1) culturally-shaped perception of chronic pain, 2) immigration-related experiences of chronic pain, 3) strategies for managing chronic pain, and 4) healthcare utilization for chronic pain. Participants report different perceptions of chronic pain, regarding how they verbalize and understand chronic pain. Most of our participants reported worsened chronic pain after immigrating to Canada and post-immigration experiences, including changes in socioeconomic status and the weather conditions, were responsible for aggravating the pain. To control their pain, participants used self-management, including adjusting lifestyles (behavioural, dietary, and psychological changes) and seeking help from social support. When self-management failed, they sought healthcare services both in their home countries and in Canada.\nDiscussion: Immigrant perceptions and perspectives of chronic pain, informed by sociocultural factors, can impact how participants make sense of their chronic pain and further impact their choice of interventions to address chronic pain. Participants experience economic stress, associated with working in physically exhausting jobs and change in weather conditions, which increase chronic pain sensitivity. Hence, it undermined their ability to cope with chronic pain. Self-management strategies were the first option to control minor pain because they are less expensive. When these strategies failed, they sought medical care to manage the pain. However, the multiple barriers they experienced such as language and cultural differences between providers and the participants, made their care experience ineffective, leading to disappointment, frustration, helplessness, and mistrust of the Canadian healthcare system.\n Conclusion: Our study findings indicate how immigrant women from diverse cultural groups perceive and manage chronic pain differently. They experienced underutilization of healthcare care in Canada. Two challenges arose during the virtual data collection: the impact of COVID-19 on the conduction of qualitative research and the virtual recruitment challenge of participant diversification. The study findings provide some implications for policymakers, researchers, immigrant-serving organizations and healthcare providers about the complexity of chronic pain recognition and management among immigrant women.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,551
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,893

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0120,005
Communication savante0,0030,001
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,224
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Même sujetLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyTravaux en français237 207