EVALUATION OF CANDIDATE FOR THE APPOINTMENT AS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR ON TTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF BIOCHEMISTRY & BIOTECHNOLOGY. The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To Whom it may concern, \nDear The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan \n \nAppointment of the candidate Dr. Muhammad Farooq as Associate Professor of Biochemistry & Biotechnology on TTS in the Department of Biochemistry & Biotechnology \n- According to the educational/professional qualification, the experience of the candidate Dr. Muhammad Farooq is evaluated as: excellent. \nThe candidate Dr. Muhammad Farooq graduated as a doctor of Veterinary medicine (DVM) at the University of Agriculture Faisalabad in Pakistan in 2001 and after that, he was Veterinary doctor in 2002-2004 in Saudi Arabia. He got the Ph.D. in 2010 at the NIBGE in Pakistan and he performed also different experience abroad such as at the University of Copenaghen, Danmark in which he was researcher assistant (2007-2008), Niigata University, Japan in which he was post-doc researcher (2010-2013) and again at the University of Copenaghen, Danmark (2013-untill now). The candidate has visited as researcher different laboratory, both national and international ones and he acquired important skills always keeping a good number of scientific publications. \n \n- According to the scientific production and bibliometrics, the experience of the candidate Dr. Muhammad Farooq is evaluated as: Very good \nIndividual contribution of the candidate to the research and development activities carried out: the candidate presents 38 publications, published with continuity in the last years; the 38 works presented by the candidate were published on International journals mainly in the first quartile and with an high average impact factor (average IF 3.81). Some publications are excellent and worthy of mention such as Nature neuroscience 2011 (IF 16.724), J Clin Invest 2010 (IF 12.575), Am J Hum Genet 2012 (IF 10.794). In the published papers, the individual contribution of the candidate is highlighted in the position of name (i.e. 13 first name). This indicates an active participation in the research carried out. \n \n \n \n- According to poster and oral presentations, the experience of the candidate Dr. Muhammad Farooq is evaluated as: Very good \nThe candidate presents 10 poster presentations and 4 oral ones; this is not an extremely high number but many of them are on international conference such as in Kyoto (Japan), Paris (France), Copenaghen (Danmark) , United Kingdom, Honolulu (Hawai), Nurnberg (Germany), Barcelona (Spain), Vancouver (Canada) and so on.. \n \nAccording also to other experience and parameters(scientific grants, practical laboratory experiences, attendance to sympoisia/conference/meeting etc...), the candidate Dr. Muhammad Farooq is evaluated as: Very good \n \n \n \n \nBased on the evaluation of the qualifications/titles and publications/research activities submitted by the candidate in the application and based on the entire application itself, I express my strong POSITIVE opinion on the evaluation of the candidate Dr. Muhammad Farooq as Associate Professor of Biochemistry & Biotechnology on TTS in the Department of Biochemistry & Biotechnology.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».