Filippo Terzi and 16th-Century Architecture in Italy and Portugal: \nResearch Traditions and New Perspectives
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Filippo Terzi (1520-1597) was born in Bologna but grew up in Pesaro. Here goldsmiths and watchmakers, as his father, prospered, and mathematical studies were cultivated. Architect at the court of the Della Rovere, a lively centre of the Sixteenth century Italian culture, he agreed in 1576 the invitation of King Sebastian to work to Portugal and was hereafter favoured by Philip II. The history of Portuguese architecture from the late nineteenth awarded him an essential role, and we might think his role was likewise eminent as a link with the Italian culture during the last quarter of sixteenth century. The political affinity between the two countries in the 1930’s stimulated studies on the Italian front, bringing out important documents but also left an ambiguous legacy: we need to debunk it, groped to reconstruct that moment. The catalogue of his work remained uncertain and not established on unambiguous documents, neither in Italy nor in Portugal. Even a manuscript acquired in 1989 by the Portuguese National Library, bears his name but cannot be ascribed to him, as this article shows. Perhaps this uncertainty has discouraged scholars in Italy, while the culture of Pesaro and Urbino in the second half of sixteenth century, even the scientific one, is now fully reevaluated. In Portugal, the studies on the same period have been more intense and have gradually brought more convincing interpretation models. The stereotypical view of the Renaissance, irradiated from the Italian centre, has undergone a substantial revision: after the half of sixteenth century, the Renaissance has long been a shared culture, a shared vision of social and professional elites, it grows among intense exchanges on European scale. The Terzi’s institutional role has become an essential key to recognizing his work. As coordinator of the major projects of the Kingdom, he is measured by the complex mechanisms and the numerous and authoritative opinions that characterize the decision processes of the Spanish monarchy, of which Portugal is a part between 1580 and 1641. Since he manages - with varying degrees of influence - the transition between design and realization, his experience of the Italian building yards has to deal with different Portuguese building tradition, particularly with the stone construction and stereotomy. This front, little explored, appears the most promising for future studies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».