Experiments in Rural Development and Ecosystem-based Management: the \nPossibilities of Community Forestry in Newfoundland
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The pulp and paper industry and the forestry sector in general, have declined in Newfoundland. In 2005, the Stephenville mill closed; in 2009, the Grand Falls mill closed; in recent years, the remaining mill in Corner Brook has shut down two of its four paper machines and gone through labour disputes and land relinquishments. The Department of Natural Resources, Forestry Branch (DNR Forestry) has based forest management and planning on the pulp and paper industry – for example, only pulp and paper companies can establish long-term leases on Crown lands. Since the once-dominant pulp and paper industry has left entire regions of the province, there are opportunities for new tenure types and new forest management. Community forestry is one such possibility that holds great promise for rural development and sustainable forestry. \n \nCommunity forestry consists of giving a community-based group the right to manage the forest, and the right to determine who benefits from forest products. Details of ownership and lease arrangements would be up to the province and to the communities involved, but could be based on pulp and paper leases, where a Community Forest Authority would assume control of the land and create forest management plans, working alongside agencies such as DNR Forestry, Wildlife, Tourism, and others. \n \nCommunity forestry has demonstrated successes in other provinces, though the structure of a community forest would need to be adapted for Newfoundland, where residents have strong economic and social links to the forest through domestic fuel wood and saw log harvests, moose hunting, fishing, cabin building, and recreational activities. Possible benefits of a community forest include expanding the decision-making power of local residents and communities over nearby forests; linking rural economic development with natural resource management; and providing a platform for discussing and resolving land use conflicts. \n \nA community forest was recently proposed in the Great Northern Peninsula, but it has a long way to go before it is actually created. Its proponents, including the St. Barbe Development Association, recognize many of the benefits of community forestry, but cannot move forward without the support of the provincial government. Though significant obstacles remain, the Great Northern Peninsula Community Forest could provide a model for communities across the province, integrating local community voices with economically, socially, and environmentally sustainable forestry. \n \n
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».