The future of urban schools: integrating community into vertical school architecture
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Today we lack a substantial discussion on how educational design \nshould define our future. As Toronto continues to increase in density, so \nhas the demand for schools. Condo apartment completions averaged \napproximately 19,000 units per year up to 2020, which is in line with levels \nfrom 2014 to 20161 . If all the proposed residential units (active and built) \nare completed and registered, the number of registered condominium units \nin the City of Toronto will increase by 12% to a total of 210,350 units which \ncould generate approximately 20,000 new students by 20512 \n. School \nboards are struggling to keep up with demands for space. Traditionally \ndesigned in a horizontal, dispersed fashion, schools are meant to provide the \nspace to promote learning and growth, relying heavily on outdoor spaces. \nHowever, as the population within the city increases, land becomes scarce. \nFostering a learning environment that is not dependent on the restrictions \nof external physical environment becomes an ever-increasing challenge. \nThis project fuses urban design and architecture together. Urban \ndesign fails when the architecture is forgotten and vice versa. Researching \nboth the current urban design strategies and the current architectural design \ntypologies of the Yonge Eglinton area, my goal is to fuse the typologies \ntogether for the future development of the area. With all the development of \nthe Yonge Eglinton area, an ongoing trend is building vertically. This thesis \nexamines the current city density and explores the advantages of a newly \nimagined mid-town school. The traditional design of a school surrounded \nby green, open space and playgrounds may no longer be a reality for areas \nof Toronto that are densely populated with unsustainable infrastructure in \nexisting schools. Therefore, this proposal supports a vertical elementary \nschool typology with access to a variety of community services in the same \nbuilding. The selected services that the mixed use project offers to the \ncommunity were purposefully chosen to cultivate meaningful relationships \nbetween the surrounding neighbourhoods, parents, students and \nteachers, creating a thoughtful and useful building dedicated to serving \nthe Yonge and Eglinton community. With this new development model, the \ncommunity will be embedded into the school. As part of my site analysis, \nthe history and the future of the Yonge Eglinton community will be taken \ninto careful consideration in order to design a site-specific community hub.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».