MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7038402313

Grand Trunk Railway of Canada : address to the bond and stock holders, with introduction and appendix, including the celebrated pamphlet 'A few reasons why the Grand Trunk Railway does not pay', and a letter to Thomas Baring, Esq., M.P. / by Joseph Nelson.

2014· article· en· W7038402313 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBondStock (firearms)TrunkRailway systemGray (unit)Work (physics)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

up the question of advocating an Imperial guarantee for the amount of 3,000,000 sterling for the construction of the Intercolonial Railway, and which I carried to a successful conclusion in 1863, and Mr. Gladstone did me the honour to inform a prominent member of the House of Commons that it was the result of workwhich I performed-which led the Government to agree to recommend Parliament to give the guarantee as based upon the Treasury minute of 1863." Confederation (in the words of Lord Durham) without the Intercolonial Railway was practically impossible ; with it, would be absolutely necessary."The construction of the Inter- colonial Railway, therefore, having been secured by me, all other questions of Confederation were simply matters of detail.It took the Provinces some time, however, to arrange these matters of detail, but in 1867 they were so far completed that they sent delegates to England who took up the railway at the point to which I had brought it, and the whole measure was passed through Parliament " as a matter of course."Then commenced a prolific distribution of honours by the Crown, in the form of Baronetcies, Knighthoods, K.C.B.'s, and C.B.'s, to certain English and Canadian gentlemen, for services rendered to " Confederation and the Intercolonial Railway."And in Canada the patronage was carried to such an extent that the two men who caused the downfall of the Commercial Bank of Canada-viz., G. J. Brydges andC.S. Ross-were rewarded by one being made a Commissioner and the other Secretary and Treasurer to the Intercolonial Railway.But I, who had devoted five years of the best portion of my life and expended £10,000 in carrying the Intercolonial Railway guarantee to a successful conclusion, have been refused even a hearing, because, in the words of three members of the Government, I have " ventured to tell the truth about the Grand Trunk Railway."But fortunately I do not stand alone as the victim of ingratitude, for the Chairman of the Intercolonial Railway Commissioners, addressing a public meeting in Canada on the 18th day of January last, an- nounced the following as their policy towards the manufac- turers and working-classes of England, who had just lent Canada £3,000,000 wherewith to build the railway :u He would venture to say for his brother commissioners as for himself that their only object was to build the cheapest and best road, and he would mention one item in which the determination they had come to would effect a large saving of expense-viz., by building their bridges of wood instead of iron.• man in London which I marked " private and confidential/ showing how in one matter alone-viz., that of contracts a sura of not less than £60,000 a year could be saved to the Grand Trunk Company in Canada.That letter, by some improper means, was laid hold of by the Grand Trunk officials in London, and by them transmitted to Mr. Brydges, shortly after the Grand Trunk meeting in April, 1868.On the 19th of May I went to Montreal for the special purpose of laying before Mr. Brydges some charges of alleged gross irregularity by the Grand Trunk officials.I was desired to repeat the statement in the presence of Mr. Hickson, and I did so.I was then told by Mr. Brydges that an action for libel would be commenced against me, and to my surprise he produced my private and confidential letter to the gentleman in London, and upon the strength of it charged me with getting up the opposition in London which had so nearly deprived him of office.He and Mr. Hickson then requested that I would put

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,989
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,810

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4320,122

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,179
Écart entre enseignants0,172 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Même sujetSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies→Travaux en français237 207→