Jesús Conill-Sancho. Ética hermenéutica. Crítica desde la facticidad. [Hermeneutic Ethics. The Critique of Facticity]. Madrid: Tecnos, 2006.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In ethical "histories" and "encyclopaedias," it is uncommon to find any chapters on hermeneutical ethics.This is rather curious, considering that the most significant representatives of contemporary moral and political philosophy come from a hermeneutic setting (Rawls, Walzer, Taylor, MacIntyre, Ricoeur, Rorty, Gadamer, Apel, Habermas, Vattimo).Why should there be such reluctance to talk specifically about hermeneutical ethics when its presence is unquestionable?Hermeneutics is often accused of lacking any critical sense, while one of the functions of philosophy is precisely to be critical.But when some hermeneutical thinkers put forward critical claims, they are reproved for forgetting the weight of facticity and the depth of experience.The purpose of this book is to overcome both the critical and the hermeneutical deficiencies by attempting to structure the demands of reason and life in a "hermeneutical ethics that is critical from facticity."The means of undertaking this consists in taking a hermeneutical approach to Kant through Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer, and taking advantage of the most relevant initiatives in critical theory from the hermeneutical sphere itself: discursive ethics (Apel and Habermas), the ethics of otherness and recognition (Ricoeur), of authenticity (Taylor), and of pietas (Vattimo).This would be an impure hermeneutical ethics, open to scientific thought, as demanded by critical rationalism (Albert), and it assumes the facticity of vital experience but also that of scientific knowledge and technological transformations.This book sets out to prove that a new critical hermeneutics can be developed from facticity, and that it is possible to open up critical reflection from the hermeneutics of facticity, discovering the Kantian roots of this hermeneutics, to the extent of presenting a "hermeneuticizable" Kant.There are obvious difficulties involved in this endeavour, at least three of which are undeniable.First of all, it is not easy to hermeneuticize Kant due to the widespread acceptance of Gadamer's interpretation in Truth and Method, according to which the Critique of Judgment constitutes a subjectivizing deviation that prevents any model of hermeneutical thought from being put forward.The second difficulty stems from the Heideggerian influence, which has guided contemporary hermeneutics-particularly that of Gadamer, a faithful disciple of Heidegger-because its complex or, rather, tangled thought often seems indisposed to any ethics or, at least, to an ethics compatible with the modern critical spirit.Thirdly, it is also difficult to consider ethics as a central aspect of philosophical hermeneutics in the manner that I call the "Gadamerian way" (which goes from Dilthey to Gadamer through Heidegger) when
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».