MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7038975722

Kai Security: A Kaupapa Māori critique and reconceptualisation of food security and food sovereignty definitions and assessment frameworks in Aotearoa

2023· dissertation· en· W7038975722 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearchSpace (University of Auckland) · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Medicine and Tropical Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAotearoaFood securitySovereigntyCapitalismFood sovereigntyColonialismOrder (exchange)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Aim: In pre-colonial Māori society, traditional Māori kai systems were sustainable, complex, and maintained hauora Māori. Māori kai systems were, and continue to be, deeply embedded in a spiritual, symbiotic relationship between tangata and whenua. However, the violent processes of colonisation and capitalism had drastic effects on Māori kai systems, kai security and kai sovereignty. Māori kai practices, traditions and values were forcibly assimilated to a Western capitalist food system, leading to a disproportionate experience of food insecurity and detrimental health outcomes between Māori and non-Māori. Despite increasing disparities, prevailing food security definitions and assessment frameworks in Aotearoa New Zealand remain rooted in colonial and capitalist contexts. This research aims to develop a Kaupapa Māori definition and assessment framework of ‘kai security’, to reduce inequities in the current kai/food system in Aotearoa New Zealand. Grounded in Māori worldviews, knowledges, values and realities, kai security includes both existing structures of food security with Māori aspirations of kai sovereignty in order to inform future strategies, interventions and policies in Aotearoa New Zealand. Objectives of this research include: 1. Understand inequities in kai/food security and kai/food sovereignty, and the mechanisms through which these inequities are created or maintained in Aotearoa. 2. Identify Māori worldviews, knowledge, values, traditions, spaces and places that comprise Māori understandings of kai and kai systems. 3. Develop a Kaupapa Māori kai security definition and framework that can more effectively identify, define and assess determinants and indicators of kai security and kai sovereignty for Māori. 4. Use the Kaupapa Māori kai security definition and framework to inform Kaupapa Māori interventions, strategies and policies can more effectively address inequities in our kai/food system in Aotearoa. Methods: Grounded in Kaupapa Māori research methodologies, this research utilised a qualitative approach. Eighteen participants from across the motu participated in one-on-one kōrero/interviews which focused on participant perspectives and expertise regarding kai/food security, kai/food sovereignty, traditional kai and kai practices, mātauranga Māori, and hauora Māori. An inductive thematic approach to analyse the data was employed using NVIVO software. This method allowed for the identification and exploration of key themes, connections, and insights that emerged from the participants' kōrero. The analysed data was contextualised within international Indigenous literature, with a focus on Indigenous peoples in Canada, US, Australia and New Zealand. Incorporating international perspectives established a comprehensive understanding of the topic and situated the development of a kai security definition and assessment framework within a broader context of Indigenous research. Overall Findings and Recommendations: This research reveals a significant gap in culturally responsive food security research in Aotearoa New Zealand. Three areas of potential food system transformation were identified and the inclusion of colonisation as a key determinant of food security was highlighted, necessitating a decolonising and reindigenising approach. Firstly, a working definition of ‘kai security’ is presented, grounded in Māori worldviews, values, knowledge and realities. Secondly, a proposed assessment framework of kai security is developed to broaden indicators and cultural considerations of Aotearoa New Zealand's food security literature and inform food security strategies, interventions and policies. Kai security encompasses all aspects of Māori kai systems and rangatiratanga, while also acknowledging existing food security structures and frameworks. Kai security is a definition and framework centres Māori food systems, practises and solutions to inform an equitable food future in Aotearoa New Zealand. Conclusions: These findings advocate for a paradigm shift towards a more inclusive and culturally responsive approach to food security definition, assessment and implementation in Aotearoa. The research highlights the comprehensive nature of Māori kai systems, highlighting the importance of centring Māori worldviews, perspectives, knowledge, and aspirations. The importance of decolonising and reindigenising the food system in Aotearoa New Zealand is central to creating equitable experiences of food security between Māori and non-Māori. To translate these findings into tangible outcomes, future research should prioritise practical implementation strategies into policy, bridging the gap between research and action.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,186
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,907

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearchSpace (University of Auckland)Même sujetHistory of Medicine and Tropical HealthTravaux en français237 207