Kai Security: A Kaupapa Māori critique and reconceptualisation of food security and food sovereignty definitions and assessment frameworks in Aotearoa
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aim: In pre-colonial Māori society, traditional Māori kai systems were sustainable, complex, and maintained hauora Māori. Māori kai systems were, and continue to be, deeply embedded in a spiritual, symbiotic relationship between tangata and whenua. However, the violent processes of colonisation and capitalism had drastic effects on Māori kai systems, kai security and kai sovereignty. Māori kai practices, traditions and values were forcibly assimilated to a Western capitalist food system, leading to a disproportionate experience of food insecurity and detrimental health outcomes between Māori and non-Māori. Despite increasing disparities, prevailing food security definitions and assessment frameworks in Aotearoa New Zealand remain rooted in colonial and capitalist contexts. This research aims to develop a Kaupapa Māori definition and assessment framework of ‘kai security’, to reduce inequities in the current kai/food system in Aotearoa New Zealand. Grounded in Māori worldviews, knowledges, values and realities, kai security includes both existing structures of food security with Māori aspirations of kai sovereignty in order to inform future strategies, interventions and policies in Aotearoa New Zealand. Objectives of this research include: 1. Understand inequities in kai/food security and kai/food sovereignty, and the mechanisms through which these inequities are created or maintained in Aotearoa. 2. Identify Māori worldviews, knowledge, values, traditions, spaces and places that comprise Māori understandings of kai and kai systems. 3. Develop a Kaupapa Māori kai security definition and framework that can more effectively identify, define and assess determinants and indicators of kai security and kai sovereignty for Māori. 4. Use the Kaupapa Māori kai security definition and framework to inform Kaupapa Māori interventions, strategies and policies can more effectively address inequities in our kai/food system in Aotearoa. Methods: Grounded in Kaupapa Māori research methodologies, this research utilised a qualitative approach. Eighteen participants from across the motu participated in one-on-one kōrero/interviews which focused on participant perspectives and expertise regarding kai/food security, kai/food sovereignty, traditional kai and kai practices, mātauranga Māori, and hauora Māori. An inductive thematic approach to analyse the data was employed using NVIVO software. This method allowed for the identification and exploration of key themes, connections, and insights that emerged from the participants' kōrero. The analysed data was contextualised within international Indigenous literature, with a focus on Indigenous peoples in Canada, US, Australia and New Zealand. Incorporating international perspectives established a comprehensive understanding of the topic and situated the development of a kai security definition and assessment framework within a broader context of Indigenous research. Overall Findings and Recommendations: This research reveals a significant gap in culturally responsive food security research in Aotearoa New Zealand. Three areas of potential food system transformation were identified and the inclusion of colonisation as a key determinant of food security was highlighted, necessitating a decolonising and reindigenising approach. Firstly, a working definition of ‘kai security’ is presented, grounded in Māori worldviews, values, knowledge and realities. Secondly, a proposed assessment framework of kai security is developed to broaden indicators and cultural considerations of Aotearoa New Zealand's food security literature and inform food security strategies, interventions and policies. Kai security encompasses all aspects of Māori kai systems and rangatiratanga, while also acknowledging existing food security structures and frameworks. Kai security is a definition and framework centres Māori food systems, practises and solutions to inform an equitable food future in Aotearoa New Zealand. Conclusions: These findings advocate for a paradigm shift towards a more inclusive and culturally responsive approach to food security definition, assessment and implementation in Aotearoa. The research highlights the comprehensive nature of Māori kai systems, highlighting the importance of centring Māori worldviews, perspectives, knowledge, and aspirations. The importance of decolonising and reindigenising the food system in Aotearoa New Zealand is central to creating equitable experiences of food security between Māori and non-Māori. To translate these findings into tangible outcomes, future research should prioritise practical implementation strategies into policy, bridging the gap between research and action.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».