MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7039510279

The national policy.

2014· article· en· W7039510279 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueAmerican History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRevenueClothingGovernment (linguistics)TariffPresidential systemNational governmentWorld War IIQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

What produced the National Policy of the United States 1 We find that in 1789, they started with a revenue tariff of 8^p er cent.; a year or two afterwards it was increased to 11p er cent.; in 1792 it was further advanced to 13 J per cent.; and in 1816 they commenced their National Policy.What caused them to inaugurate that policy in 1816?It was the war of 1812.They found they were depending on England for the guns with which to fight her, for the powder and shot for the army, for cloth for the clothing of the soldiers, for blankets to cover the troops ; and so they settled the war question, and immediately afterwards they inaugurated the National Policy, which averaged 21 per cent.That continued for four years.After the next presidential election in 18^0, what did the manufacturers of England dol They rented warehouses at the seat of Government in the United States and brought manufactured goods there to prove that they could not be manufactured cheaper in the United States.What did the people of the United States say 1 They said if we ever intend to be a great, prosperous and independent nation, we must bring manufactures to this country, so that our people will be benefited by having the factories established here.They said we do not object to English manufacturers selling goods here, but to our people being compelled to take their farm produce to England, leave the money there and bring back manufactured goods.We have no objection to English manufacturers selling goods to the people of the United States, they said, but we intend to impose such high protective duties as will compel English manufacturers to come to the United States and manufacture their goods, and thus our people will spend their money at home.In 1820 the tariff was advanced to 26 per cent.Four years afterwards it was increased to 38 per cent.; in 1828 to 42 per cent.; 1832 the compromise tariff was introduced, which was on a sliding scale for 10 years, reducing 2 per cent, per annum, which had the effect of diminishing the duties from 42 per cent, to 20 per cent.After the ten years the tariff was increased to 33 per cent., then it was reduced to 24 per cent., and in 1857 it was reduced to a revenue tariff of 19 per cent.Tn 1861 it was decreased, and in 1872 it was increased.What is it to-day"?It averages 40 per cent, on cottons, over 61 per cent, on cloths, over 53 per cent, on carpets, and on leaf tobacco grown in any other country, 35 cents per pound.If the arguments used by hon.gentlemen opposite be correct, the consumers of leaf tobacco in the United States must pay 35 cents per pound additional.What is the Tariff to-day in this country 1 On woollen blankets and cloths, 7 \ cents per lb.and 20 per cent.; cottons, 35 per cent, and 25 per cent, on hats. THE RECIPROCITY TREATY AND ITS ABROGATION.What produced the National Policy in this country 1 We had a Reciprocity Treaty with the United States for a period of ten years, from 1856 to 1866.At the time of its abrogation, what did the Americans say 1 They said we are establishing a protective policy ; we think the best course to pursue is not to renew the Reciprocity Treaty, and they would not renew it.Then we had to do that which we thought best for ourselves.What did hon.gentlemen opposite do when they were in power] They sent Hon.George Brown to Washington at an expense of $6,000 to see if he could not bring about another Reciprocity Treaty.The Americans, however, said to him that he had better return to Canada, that they had a Reciprocity Treaty for ten years and did not want another, that they were very well satisfied with their trade policy, and when they wanted reciprocity with Canada they would let the Dominion know.It was when the hon.gentleman came back that the leader of the Conservative party, though he was in Opposition, asked hon.gen- tlemen to bring down a protective Tariff, and the Conservative party would assist them in carrying it out.When the ex-Finance Minister was urged to adopt this policy, he stood up in the House and said they were nothing but flies on the wheel of this grea* nation, and that it would be useless to attempt to do anything of this Kind.As I said on a former occasion, they are nothing but flies on the wheel, and they are like all other flies.If you have a sore on your hand, first one fly comes, then another, and another, until it is covered with flies, not for the purpose of trying to heal the sore, but to make it worse.If we

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,647
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,583

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,165
Écart entre enseignants0,159 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Même sujetAmerican History and CultureTravaux en français237 207