Organizations, order, and peace: policing Northern Ireland in the aftermath of Brexit
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Despite an extensive literature on security sector reform processes after conflict, there is little recognition that peacebuilding is an organisational, as well as a political endeavour (Murphy et al, 2018). This paper explores the experience of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, located within a long running ethno political conflict, and still unsettled in its organisational identity and history. While the past twenty years have seen enormous change in policing in Northern Ireland, the ‘new beginning to policing’ envisioned by the post agreement Independent Commission on Policing has not been fully realised (Ellison, 2007). Though significant aspects of the change have been successful, there remain serious and enduring challenges that suggest the organisation is still a significant distance from the original transformative aims (Murphy, 2019). The system change represented by Brexit has heightened political uncertainty and refocused attention on the ongoing security threat. All these factors raise both operational risk and challenges to inclusive policing. We argue that having embarked upon a process of change, the police in Northern Ireland are trapped in liminal space – unable to move forward to ‘ordinary’ policing and unsure how to respond to a renewed threat. The paper draws on data from seventy separate interviews with participants within the Northern Ireland policing sector, their advisors and other key stakeholders over a period of thirteen years (2002-2015). The research approach adopted was process based and longitudinal utilizing a single case study method, with a concern for explanatory analysis (Pettigrew 1990, Yin 1993, Yin 2003). Of the seventy interviews conducted, roughly two thirds were with individuals directly associated with the policing change process. The rest were representatives of NGOs, journalists, politically active participants and advisors, senior individuals associated the voluntary sector, academics or community relations and mediation professionals who had engaged with the organisation at different stages with the clear objective of creating lasting change (Dawson, 2003).<br/><br/>Ellison, G. (2007). A Blueprint for Democratic Policing Anywhere in the World? Police Quarterly, 10(3), 243-269<br/>Murphy, J., McDowell, S., Braniff, M. & Denyer, D. (2018), Managing contested spaces: Public managers, obscured mechanisms and the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 36, 3<br/>Murphy, J., (2017), Leading through Conflict and Change: Chief Constables in Northern Ireland, in Leading the Police: A History of Chief Constables. Stevenson, K., Cox, D. J. & Channing, I. (eds.). Routledge, (Routledge SOLON Explorations in Crime and Criminal Justice Histories).<br/><br/>
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».