Parent and peer attachment relationships and non-suicidal self-injury in young adolescents
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is defined as the deliberate destruction of one's own body tissue without suicidal intent and for purposes not socially sanctioned, thus excluding tattooing and piercing (Favazza, 1998). The high prevalence rate in both clinical and community studies have prompted researchers to explore correlates associated with this behaviour. While a large body of research has documented the role of emotion regulation in NSSI, the social functions have not been as extensively studied and warrant further attention (Muehlenkamp, Brausch, Quigley, & Whitlock, 2013). Scholars have provided consistent evidence that family relationship problems are associated with reports of NSSI. However, most used a composite score to measure the overall quality of attachment (e.g., Gratz, Conrad, & Roemer, 2002; Hilt, Nock, Lloyd-Richardson, & Prinstein, 2008a). As proposed by Parkes and Stevenson-Hinde (1982), attachment is a multifaceted concept comprised of behavioural and cognitive/affective domains. Accordingly, there is a need to further investigate which attachment dimensions (e.g., trust, communication, and alienation) are more predictive of NSSI status. Only one study to date has examined the contribution of several parent attachment dimensions to NSSI among college students (Bureau et al., 2010), but this has not been investigated among young adolescents. In the light of the fact that NSSI has its onset typically during the early teen years (Nock, 2009) and that peers are increasingly influential following the transition to high school (Allen & Land, 1999), additional research examining the association between parent and peer attachment dimensions, and NSSI in early adolescence is needed. In order to address this research gap, the main objectives of the current study were a) to examine group (NSSI/ Non-NSSI) and gender differences in parent and peer attachment dimensions (i.e., trust, communication, and alienation); b) to explore a potential interaction between NSSI status and gender; and c) to investigate the relative contribution of parent attachment versus peer attachment to NSSI status. Participants were 65 adolescents (M age = 12.37, SD = .52; 57% female) who reported engaging in NSSI and a comparison group of adolescents matched on gender and school. Participants completed the How I Deal With Stress questionnaire (HIDS; Heath & Ross, 2007) in order to screen for NSSI. They also completed the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA; Armsden & Greenberg, 1987) to examine three attachment dimensions (i.e., trust, communication, and alienation). These self-reported questionnaires were completed during class time in their school classrooms in small groups of 20. Results from a two-way MANOVA indicated that young adolescents who reported engaging in NSSI perceived their relationships with parents and peers more negatively on all attachment dimensions relative to their non-self-injuring counterparts. Furthermore, a logistic regression revealed that parent attachment was more predictive of NSSI status than peer attachment. Overall, this study represents a contribution to the NSSI literature as it extends our knowledge about the relationship between attachment dimensions and NSSI in early adolescence, and suggests that males and females who engage in NSSI are equally affected by quality of communication, the degree of trust, and alienation issues with parents and peers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».